You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 2, January 24, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

In Search of Fewer Independent Risk Factors

Daniel J. Brotman, MD; Esteban Walker, PhD; Michael S. Lauer, MD; Ralph G. O’Brien, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:138-145.

More than 1100 articles now appear annually investigating "independent risk factors" or "independent predictors" for various clinical outcomes. In medical research, independence is generally defined in a statistical sense: a variable is called an independent risk factor if it has a significant contribution to an outcome in a statistical model that includes established risk factors. As such, independence is based on a specific statistical model and depends on the set of established risk factors included in that model. Even when strong statistical evidence indicates that a variable is an independent risk factor for an outcome, this does not necessarily indicate that the risk factor causally contributes to the outcome. The opposite is also true: risk factors that have causal relationships with the outcome will not necessarily prove to be independent risk factors. These are basic statistical principles that are too often given short shrift in medical research. Herein, we discuss the clinical implications conferred by the above definition of independence, primarily using examples from recent cardiovascular literature. A glossary and schema are provided to help clinicians and researchers understand and discuss these matters effectively.


Author Affiliations: Departments of General Internal Medicine (Dr Brotman), Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Drs O’Brien and Walker), Vascular Surgery (Dr Walker), and Cardiovascular Medicine (Dr Lauer), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Loss of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Fall in Patients With Renal Impairment—Reply
Michael B. Davidson and Daniel J. Brotman
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(19):2159.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

C-Reactive Protein as a Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Buckley et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:483-495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emerging Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease: A Summary of Systematic Reviews Conducted for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Helfand et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:496-507.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Integrated associations of genotypes with multiple blood biomarkers linked to coronary heart disease risk
Drenos et al.
Hum Mol Genet 2009;18:2305-2316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how?
Moons et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b375-b375.
FULL TEXT  

C-Reactive Protein and Coronary Heart Disease: Predictive Test or Therapeutic Target?
Hingorani et al.
Clin. Chem. 2009;55:239-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thrombolytic Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism--Invited Commentary
Brotman and Streiff
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2191-2192.
FULL TEXT  

The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?
Starfield et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008;62:580-583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Length of Stay and Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism: High Time for Evidence-Based Discharge Criteria
Brotman and Lindenauer
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:683-684.
FULL TEXT  

C-reactive Protein: Does It Predict Mortality?
Donaldson
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:209-210.
FULL TEXT  

Will My Patient Fall?
Ganz et al.
JAMA 2007;297:77-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Loss of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Fall in Patients With Renal Impairment--Reply
Davidson and Brotman
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2159-2159.
FULL TEXT  

Betel-quid use is associated with the risk of the metabolic syndrome in adults
Guh et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006;83:1313-1320.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Linking observational and genetic approaches to determine the role of C-reactive protein in heart disease risk
Hingorani et al.
Eur Heart J 2006;27:1261-1263.
FULL TEXT  

When Is a New Prediction Marker Useful?: A Consideration of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and C-Reactive Protein for Stroke Risk
Greenland and O'Malley
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2454-2456.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.