You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 22, Dec 12/26, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •Neurology
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The American Public and the Terri Schiavo Case

Robert J. Blendon, ScD; John M. Benson, MA; Melissa J. Herrmann, MA

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2580-2584.

An important question for physicians in the aftermath of the Terri Schiavo case is whether the effort of elected officials to intervene was a one-time anomaly or signals a future trend of elected officials being involved in cases where patients are in a vegetative or long-term comatose state. To try to answer this question, we used results from 12 national opinion surveys conducted in March and April 2005, when the Schiavo case was being debated. A review of these survey results showed that efforts by elected politicians to intervene in the Schiavo case were opposed by the majority of Americans. However, the public was more divided on the question of whether Schiavo’s feeding tube should be removed. Opposition to removing Schiavo’s feeding tube was associated with opposition to abortion. The results suggest that issues involved in cases like Schiavo’s are not likely to disappear from the political agenda.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Blendon and Mr Benson); and ICR/International Communications Research, Media, Pa (Ms Herrmann).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Refusal of Hydration and Nutrition: Irrelevance of the "Artificial" vs "Natural" Distinction
Robert D. Truog and Thomas I. Cochrane
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2574-2576.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Forgoing Medically Provided Nutrition and Hydration in Children
Diekema et al.
Pediatrics 2009;124:813-822.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Theresa Schiavo's tragedy and ours, too
Bernat
Neurology 2008;71:964-965.
FULL TEXT  

Congress, Controlled Substances, and Physician-Assisted Suicide -- Elephants in Mouseholes
Annas
NEJM 2006;354:1079-1084.
FULL TEXT  

Commentary: psychiatric advance directives as tools for enhancing treatment of the mentally ill.
Schouten
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2006;34:58-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.