You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 165 No. 3, February 14, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Transfer of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci via Health Care Worker Hands

Amy N. Duckro, DO; Donald W. Blom, RN; Elizabeth A. Lyle, AB; Robert A. Weinstein, MD; Mary K. Hayden, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:302-307.

Background  The roles of the contaminated hospital environment and of patient skin carriage in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are uncertain. Transfer of VRE via health care worker (HCW) hands is assumed but unproved. We sought to determine the frequency of VRE transmission from sites in the environment or on patients’ intact skin to clean environmental or skin sites via contaminated hands of HCWs during routine care.

Methods  We cultured sites on the intact skin of 22 patients colonized by VRE, as well as sites in the patients’ rooms, before and after routine care by 98 HCWs. Observers recorded sites touched by HCWs. Cultures were obtained from HCW hands and/or gloves before and after care. All isolates underwent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. We defined a transfer to have occurred when a culture-negative site became positive with a VRE pulsotype after being touched by an HCW who had the same pulsotype on his or her hands or gloves and who had previously touched a colonized or contaminated site.

Results  Health care workers touched 151 negative sites after touching a site that was positive for VRE. Sixteen negative sites (10.6%) became positive after contact. The percentage of times that contact with a site led to a transfer was highest for antecubital fossae and blood pressure cuffs.

Conclusions  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci were transferred from contaminated sites in the environment or on patients’ intact skin to clean sites via HCW hands or gloves in 10.6% of opportunities. Controlling VRE by decontaminating the environment and patients’ intact skin may be an important adjunctive infection control measure.


Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases (Drs Duckro, Weinstein, and Hayden, Mr Blom, and Ms Lyle), and Department of Pathology (Dr Hayden), Rush University Medical Center, and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County (Drs Duckro and Weinstein), Chicago, Ill.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Universal Patient Disinfection as a Tool for Infection Control: Rub-A-Dub-Dub, No Need for a Tub
Peterson and Singh
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:274-276.
FULL TEXT  

Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Vernon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:306-312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency and Possible Infection Control Implications of Gastrointestinal Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Boyce et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:5992-5995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.