 |
|
Management of Aortic Disease in Marfan Syndrome
A Decision Analysis
Seo Young Kim, MD;
Neil Martin, BA;
Elizabeth C. Hsia, MD, MSCE;
Reed E. Pyeritz, MD, PhD;
Daniel A. Albert, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:749-755.
Background Marfan syndrome is a relatively common heritable disorder of connective tissue that affects numerous organ systems, but the most severe complication is aortic aneurysm and dissection. A variety of medical and surgical approaches are available for managing the cardiovascular complications. Our objective was to compare elective composite graft surgery, elective valve-sparing surgery, and medical management for patients with both Marfan syndrome and thoracic aortic disease on the basis of life expectancy with differing diameters of the aortic root and rate of increase in the aortic root size.
Methods A Markov decision analysis model was constructed to compare the 2 surgical options with watchful waiting with medical therapy.
Results For our base-case analysis of a 20-year-old patient with Marfan syndrome and thoracic aortic aneurysm, the aortic valve-sparing option was preferred. It extended life expectancy to 73.8 years compared with the medical treatment option (71.4 years) and with the composite graft surgery (72.7 years). Our results show that there is a better outcome for a patient with an aortic root diameter between 3.0 and 3.5 cm with early prophylactic surgery than with deferred or emergency surgery. Medical treatment was preferred when the aortic root diameter was smaller than 3.0 cm.
Conclusions Although long-term follow-up data are not yet available, it appears that advances in the technique of valve-sparing surgery have made it the preferred option to composite graft, primarily to avoid the complications of anticoagulation. Our study indicates that patients who have an aortic root diameter of larger than 3.0 cm should be considered for prophylactic aortic surgery.
Author Affiliations: Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine (Drs Kim, Hsia, and Albert and Mr Martin), Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine (Dr Pyeritz), Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Hsia and Albert), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Dr Albert), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo (Dr Kim).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Aortic Diameter >=5.5 cm Is Not a Good Predictor of Type A Aortic Dissection: Observations From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)
Pape et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1120-1127.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The time horizons of formal decision analyses
Benbassat and Baumal
QJM 2007;100:383-388.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
