 |
 |

Costs for Heart Failure With Normal vs Reduced Ejection Fraction
Lawrence Liao, MD;
James G. Jollis, MD;
Kevin J. Anstrom, PhD;
David J. Whellan, MD;
Dalane W. Kitzman, MD;
Gerard P. Aurigemma, MD;
Daniel B. Mark, MD;
Kevin A. Schulman, MD;
John S. Gottdiener, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:112-118.
Background Among the elderly population, heart failure (HF) with normal ejection fraction (EF) is more common than classic HF with low EF. However, there are few data regarding the costs of HF with normal EF. In a prospective, population-based cohort of elderly participants, we compared the costs and resource use of patients with HF and normal and reduced EF.
Methods A total of 4549 participants (84.5% white; 40.6% male) in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Cardiovascular Health Study were linked to Medicare claims from 1992 through 1998. By protocol echo examinations or clinical EF assessments, 881 participants with HF were characterized as having abnormal or normal EF. We applied semiparametric estimators to calculate mean costs per subject for a 5-year period.
Results There were 495 HF participants with normal EF (186 prevalent at study entry and 309 incident during the study period) and 386 participants with abnormal EF (166 prevalent and 220 incident). Participants with abnormal EF had more cardiology encounters and cardiac procedures. However, compared with abnormal EF participants, the 5-year costs for normal EF participants were similar in both the prevalent ($33 023 with abnormal EF and $32 580 with normal EF; P = .93) and incident ($49 128 with abnormal EF and $45 604 with normal EF; P = .55) groups. In models accounting for comorbid conditions, the costs with normal and abnormal EF remained similar.
Conclusions Over a 5-year period, patients with HF and normal EF consume as many health care resources as those with reduced EF. These data highlight the substantial financial burden of HF with normal EF among the elderly population.
Author Affiliations: Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (Drs Liao, Jollis, Anstrom, Mark, and Schulman); Jefferson Heart Institute, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Whellan); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr Kitzman); University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester (Dr Aurigemma); and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Dr Gottdiener).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Heart failure burden and therapy
Zannad et al.
Europace 2009;11:v1-v9.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction failure to preserve, failure of reserve, and failure on the compliance curve.
Najjar
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:419-421.
FULL TEXT
Office management of patients with diastolic heart failure
Tzanetos et al.
CMAJ 2009;180:520-527.
FULL TEXT
Heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnostic pitfalls and epidemiology
Hawkins et al.
Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:130-139.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diastolic Dysfunction: One Piece of the Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction Puzzle
Kitzman
Circulation 2008;117:2044-2046.
FULL TEXT
How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology
Paulus et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2539-2550.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Costs of the Metabolic Syndrome in Elderly Individuals: Findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study
Curtis et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2553-2558.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Should Patients Receive Secondary Prevention Medications For Free After A Myocardial Infarction? An Economic Analysis
Choudhry et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:186-194.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|