 |
|
Medicare Coverage of Tumor Necrosis Factor  Inhibitors as an Influence on Physicians’ Prescribing Behavior
Esi Morgan DeWitt, MD, MSCE;
Henry A. Glick, PhD;
Daniel A. Albert, MD;
Marshall M. Joffe, MD, PhD;
Frederick Wolfe, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:57-63.
Background Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic debilitating disease that affects 1% of the population. Tumor necrosis factor  inhibitors, such as etanercept and infliximab, have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by averting disability but at great financial expense, generally borne by third-party payors. Prior to implementation of the Medicare Modernization Act, Medicare reimbursed for the infusion drug infliximab but not for the self-injectable drug etanercept. To determine the impact of this differential Medicare drug coverage on physicians’ prescribing behavior in clinical practice, we analyzed patterns of prescribing etanercept and infliximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had public insurance compared with those who had private insurance.
Methods We conducted an observational cohort study of 1663 patients with rheumatoid arthritis newly prescribed etanercept or infliximab after enrollment in the National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases. Univariate and multivariable analyses of patient demographic and disease characteristics were conducted to characterize predictors of the biologic drug prescribed.
Results Treatment groups who received etanercept and infliximab differed in 6 of 8 demographic variables and in 8 of 10 disease variables. However, stratification by type of insurance reduced many of these differences. In multivariable analyses, type of insurance plan and demographic factors were strong predictors of differential prescribing of etanercept compared with prescribing of infliximab, whereas disease characteristics generally were not. Patients with public insurance were 30% more likely to receive infliximab than those who were privately insured (P<.001).
Conclusions Public insurance predicted prescription of infliximab, reflecting preferential Medicare reimbursement for infusion drugs. Financial considerations are influential in physicians’ prescription decisions. Differential drug coverage has an impact on patient care and health care costs because it influences physicians’ prescribing behavior.
Author Affiliations: Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa (Drs Morgan DeWitt and Albert); Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Glick, Albert, and Joffe) and Department of Medicine (Drs Glick and Albert), School of Medicine, and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Drs Glick and Albert), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Arthritis Research Center Foundation, School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Wichita (Dr Wolfe). Dr Morgan DeWitt is now with the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Etanercept or Infliximab: The Patient’s Considerations
Robert C. Sherrick
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(13):1418.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
A Call for Fairness in Formulary Decisions
Wendy Levinson and Andreas Laupacis
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):16-18.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The efficacy of inhibiting tumour necrosis factor {alpha} and interleukin 1 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis and adjusted indirect comparisons
Nixon et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1140-1147.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
What Interventions Should Pharmacists Employ to Impact Health Practitioners' Prescribing Practices?
Grindrod et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:1546-1557.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Etanercept or Infliximab: The Patient's Considerations.
Sherrick
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1418-1418.
FULL TEXT
Evaluating The Therapeutic Package for Diabetic Patients: The Whole Exceeds the Sum of Its Parts
Leichter
Clin. Diabetes 2006;24:102-104.
FULL TEXT
A Call for Fairness in Formulary Decisions
Levinson and Laupacis
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:16-18.
FULL TEXT
|
