 |
 |

An Assessment of Incremental Coronary Risk Prediction Using C-Reactive Protein and Other Novel Risk Markers
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Aaron R. Folsom, MD, MPH;
Lloyd E. Chambless, PhD;
Christie M. Ballantyne, MD;
Josef Coresh, MD, PhD;
Gerardo Heiss, MD;
Kenneth K. Wu, MD, PhD;
Eric Boerwinkle, PhD;
Thomas H. Mosley, Jr, PhD;
Paul Sorlie, PhD;
Guoqing Diao, PhD;
A. Richey Sharrett, MD, DrPH
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1368-1373.
Background There has been interest in recent years in whether additional, and in particular novel, risk factors or blood markers, such as C-reactive protein, can enhance existing coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction models.
Methods Using a series of case-cohort studies, the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study assessed the association of 19 novel risk markers with incident CHD in 15 792 adults followed up since 1987-1989. Novel markers included measures of inflammation, endothelial function, fibrin formation, fibrinolysis, B vitamins, and antibodies to infectious agents. Change in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the additional contribution of novel risk markers to CHD prediction beyond that of traditional risk factors.
Results The basic risk factor model, which included traditional risk factors (age, race, sex, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, smoking status, and diabetes), predicted CHD well, as evidenced by an AUC of approximately 0.8. The C-reactive protein level did not add significantly to the AUC (increase in AUC of 0.003), and neither did most other novel risk factors. Of the 19 markers studied, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, vitamin B6, interleukin 6, and soluble thrombomodulin added the most to the AUC (range, 0.006-0.011).
Conclusions Our findings suggest that routine measurement of these novel markers is not warranted for risk assessment. On the other hand, our findings reinforce the utility of major, modifiable risk factor assessment to identify individuals at risk for CHD for preventive action.
Author Affiliations: Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Drs Folsom); Department of Biostatistics (Drs Chambless and Diao), and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health (Dr Heiss), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine (Dr Ballantyne), Hemostasis Laboratory, Division of Hematology (Dr Wu), and Human Genetics Center and Institute of Molecular Medicine (Dr Boerwinkle), University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston; Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Coresh and Sharrett) and Biostatistics and Medicine (Dr Coresh), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md; Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (Dr Mosley); and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Sorlie).
RELATED ARTICLE
Predicting Cardiovascular Risk: So What Do We Do Now?
Donald M. Lloyd-Jones and Lu Tian
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(13):1342-1344.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in Patients at Metabolic Risk: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Rosenzweig et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:3671-3689.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Importance of a Patient's Personal Health History on Assessments of Future Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Mainous et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:408-413.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Review: Endothelial progenitor cells: markers of vascular reparative capacity
Povsic and Goldschmidt-Clermont
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease 2008;2:199-213.
ABSTRACT
Effects of Socioeconomic Position on Inflammatory and Hemostatic Markers: A Life-Course Analysis in the 1958 British Birth Cohort
Tabassum et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1332-1341.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
New cardiovascular risk determinants do exist and are clinically useful
Levinson
Eur Heart J 2008;29:1335-1335.
FULL TEXT
Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Outpatient Kidney Transplant Clinic: The Framingham Risk Score Revisited
Kiberd and Panek
CJASN 2008;3:822-828.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Why traumatic leg amputees are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases
Naschitz and Lenger
QJM 2008;101:251-259.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Risk Stratification Schemes to Predict Thromboembolism in People With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
Fang et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:810-815.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
New cardiovascular risk determinants do exist and are clinically useful
Smulders et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:436-440.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
New cardiovascular risk factors exist, but are they clinically useful?
Wang
Eur Heart J 2008;29:441-444.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Myeloperoxidase, but not C-reactive protein, predicts cardiovascular risk in peripheral arterial disease
Brevetti et al.
Eur Heart J 2008;29:224-230.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, Biomarkers, and Metformin: Research, Risk, and Reality
Sattar and Nelson
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;93:34-36.
FULL TEXT
Risk assessment in the patient with established peripheral arterial disease
Haugen et al.
Vasc Med 2007;12:343-350.
ABSTRACT
Rate of Change and Instability in Body Mass Index, Insulin Resistance, and Lipid Metabolism as Predictors of Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease
Christen et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:3780-3787.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Added Value With an Integrated Approach?
Koenig
Circulation 2007;116:3-5.
FULL TEXT
Association of Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness, Plaques, and C-Reactive Protein With Future Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: The Cardiovascular Health Study
Cao et al.
Circulation 2007;116:32-38.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk using a Genetic Risk Score: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Morrison et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:28-35.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
C-Reactive Protein and the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events Among Those at Intermediate Risk: Moving an Inflammatory Hypothesis Toward Consensus
Ridker
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2129-2138.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Prognostic Accuracy of Coronary Calcification
Guerci
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1871-1873.
FULL TEXT
The Year in Atherothrombosis
Sanz et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1740-1749.
FULL TEXT
C-Reactive Protein and Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease and Global Vascular Events in the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER)
Sattar et al.
Circulation 2007;115:981-989.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction
Cook
Circulation 2007;115:928-935.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Development and Validation of Improved Algorithms for the Assessment of Global Cardiovascular Risk in Women: The Reynolds Risk Score
Ridker et al.
JAMA 2007;297:611-619.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Multiple Biomarkers for the Prediction of First Major Cardiovascular Events and Death
Wang et al.
NEJM 2006;355:2631-2639.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hyperinsulinemia and Cognitive Decline in a Middle-Aged Cohort
Young et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2688-2693.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lp-PLA2: A New Kid on the Block
Zalewski et al.
Clin. Chem. 2006;52:1645-1650.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Nontraditional CHD Risk Markers: How Much Value Do They Add?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT
C-Reactive Protein: Not Ready for Population-Wide CVD Risk Assessment
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT
Predicting cardiovascular risk: so what do we do now?
Lloyd-Jones and Tian
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1342-1344.
FULL TEXT
|