You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 13, July 10, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation and Treatment of Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice

The Difference Between Guidelines Is Largely Academic

Jeffrey A. Linder, MD, MPH; Joseph C. Chan, BS; David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1374-1379.

Background  The guidelines from the American College of Physicians and the Infectious Diseases Society of America differ with respect to the use of clinical criteria and microbiologic testing to identify adults with pharyngitis who are likely to have group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

Methods  To measure the rate of adherence to 3 strategies, we performed a retrospective analysis of visits to Boston, Mass, area primary care clinics by adults with a diagnosis of pharyngitis (n = 2097).

Results  The 4-point Centor criteria recommended by the American College of Physicians and Infectious Diseases Society of America were not predictive of streptococcal testing (results for 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 criteria were 79%, 81%, 79%, 80%, and 74%, respectively; P = .63) but were predictive of a positive streptococcal test (8%, 13%, 22%, 31%, and 30%, respectively; P<.001) and of antibiotic prescribing (25%, 34%, 63%, 80%, and 89%, respectively; P<.001). Clinicians were adherent to the American College of Physicians' empirical strategy in 12% of visits, the American College of Physicians' test strategy in 30% of visits, the Infectious Diseases Society of America's strategy in 30% of visits, and adherent to none of these strategies in 66% of visits. The most common reason for nonadherence to any strategy was testing or antibiotic prescribing to patients at low risk of streptococcal pharyngitis (1076 visits; 78% of the visits in which physicians were nonadherent to any strategy), patients for whom the guidelines agree.

Conclusions  The major problem in the testing and treatment of adults with pharyngitis is not which guideline to follow, but that clinicians usually fail to follow any guideline. Interventions should focus on an area where the guidelines agree: avoiding testing and antibiotic prescribing to patients at low risk for streptococcal pharyngitis.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (Drs Linder and Bates and Mr Chan); and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Linder and Bates).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Pharyngitis: How and Why
Eric L. Westerman
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2290-2291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonadherence to Guidelines
Jihad Irani
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Adults With Acute Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice
Alan L. Bisno, Michael A. Gerber, and Edward L. Kaplan
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2291.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Adults With Acute Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice—Reply
Jeffrey A. Linder and David W. Bates
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(20):2292.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Pharyngitis Management: Focusing on Where We Agree
Robert M. Centor and Stuart James Cohen
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(13):1345-1346.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Performance of a Rapid Antigen-Detection Test and Throat Culture in Community Pediatric Offices: Implications for Management of Pharyngitis
Tanz et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:437-444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in the Retail Health Care Setting Using National Clinical Guidelines for Acute Pharyngitis
Woodburn et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:457-462.
ABSTRACT  

Validation of a Decision Aid to Assist Physicians in Reducing Unnecessary Antibiotic Drug Use for Acute Cystitis
McIsaac et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2201-2206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences Among International Pharyngitis Guidelines: Not Just Academic
Matthys et al.
Ann Fam Med 2007;5:436-443.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharyngitis: how and why.
Westerman
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2290-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Nonadherence to guidelines.
Irani
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2291-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Adults With Acute Pharyngitis in Primary Care Practice--Reply
Linder and Bates
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2292-2292.
FULL TEXT  

Treatment of adults with acute pharyngitis in primary care practice.
Bisno et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2291-2291.
FULL TEXT  

Managing Pharyngitis: Guideline, What Guideline?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2006;2006:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Pharyngitis management: focusing on where we agree.
Centor and Cohen
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1345-1346.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.