You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 22, Dec 11/25, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status

Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH; Lynn C. Hartmann, MD; Celine M. Vachon, PhD; Robert A. Vierkant, MS; Alice H. Wang, BS; Janet E. Olson, PhD; Thomas A. Sellers, PhD; James R. Cerhan, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2478-2483.

Background  Physical activity is a potentially modifiable breast cancer risk factor. There is considerable recent evidence to suggest that risk factors for breast cancer differ based on its subtype, particularly estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status, but this has been less well studied for physical activity. The objective of this study was to examine the association of physical activity with breast cancer incidence based on ER/PR status of the tumor.

Methods  The Iowa Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort study of 41 836 postmenopausal women. Recreational physical activity was self-reported on the baseline questionnaire, and 3 levels (high, medium, and low) were defined. Breast cancer incidence and ER/PR status, through 18 years of follow-up, were ascertained by linkage with the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate multivariate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer, adjusting for other breast cancer risk factors.

Results  During 554 819 person-years of follow-up, 2548 incident cases of breast cancer were observed. Compared with low physical activity, high physical activity levels were inversely associated with risk of breast cancer (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96), and there were inverse associations for ER-positive (ER+)/PR-positive (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), ER+/PR-negative (PR) (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96), and ER-negative/PR (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.14) tumors. Further adjustment for body mass index attenuated the overall association with breast cancer (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82-1.01) and for ER+/PR-positive tumors (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08), while there was no change for ER+/PR tumors (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.94).

Conclusions  Higher recreational physical activity might reduce the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer overall. Risk reduction varies by ER/PR status of the tumor, being most marked for ER+/PR tumors, which, in general, have been associated with a clinically more aggressive tumor phenotype. If confirmed in additional studies, these results would suggest that additional mechanisms, besides an effect on body mass, may account for observed protective effects of physical activity in reducing breast cancer.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Internal Medicine (Dr Bardia), Medical Oncology (Dr Hartmann), and Health Sciences Research (Drs Vachon, Olson, and Cerhan, Mr Vierkant, and Ms Wang), Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn; and Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Fla (Dr Sellers).


RELATED LETTERS

The Number Needed to Be Exposed: A Potential Use for Quantifying the Strength of an Individual Risk Factor Including a Protective Factor in a Cohort Study
Huai yong Cheng
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1690.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Number Needed to Be Exposed: A Potential Use for Quantifying the Strength of an Individual Risk Factor Including a Protective Factor in a Cohort Study—Reply
James R. Cerhan, Aditya Bardia, Robert A. Vierkant, and Celine M. Vachon
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1690-1691.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Number Needed to Be Exposed: A Potential Use for Quantifying the Strength of an Individual Risk Factor Including a Protective Factor in a Cohort Study
Cheng
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1690-1690.
FULL TEXT  

The Number Needed to Be Exposed: A Potential Use for Quantifying the Strength of an Individual Risk Factor Including a Protective Factor in a Cohort Study Reply
Cerhan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1690-1691.
FULL TEXT  

Exercise and Breast Cancer Risk Revisited
JWatch Women's Health 2007;2007:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.