This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (10)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Thrombolysis  • Cardiovascular System  • Evidence-Based Medicine  • Review  • Adverse Effects  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Meta-analysis

Kent J. DeZee, MD, MPH; William T. Shimeall, MD, MPH; Kevin M. Douglas, MD; Nathan M. Shumway, DO; Patrick G. O’Malley, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:391-397.

Background  Patients taking oral anticoagulants with an international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 4.0 are at increased risk for bleeding. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of phytonadione (vitamin K) in treating excessive anticoagulation.

Methods  The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched (without language restrictions) for articles published between January 1985 and September 2004. Randomized controlled trials or prospective, nonrandomized trials that used vitamin K to treat patients without major hemorrhage with an INR greater than 4.0 due to oral anticoagulant use were included. The primary outcome was achievement of the target INR (1.8-4.0) at 24 hours after vitamin K administration. Summary estimates were calculated using a random effects model.

Results  Twenty-one studies (10 randomized and 11 prospective trials) were included. Among oral vitamin K treatment arms (4, n = 75), the proportion with a target INR at 24 hours was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-93%), which was similar to intravenous vitamin K treatment arms (6, n = 69; target INR, 77%; 95% CI, 60%-95%). Treatment arms of subcutaneous vitamin K (3, n = 58; 31%; 95% CI, 7%-55%) and placebo/observation (2, n = 27; 20%; 95% CI, 0%-47%) were less likely to achieve target INR at 24 hours. Only 1 of 21 trials appropriately assessed for adverse events, so a summary estimate for bleeding risk could not be generated.

Conclusions  Limited evidence suggests that oral and intravenous vitamin K are equivalent and more effective for excessive anticoagulation than simply withholding warfarin sodium. Subcutaneous vitamin K, however, is inferior to oral and intravenous vitamin K for this indication and is similar to placebo. Whether treatment with vitamin K decreases hemorrhagic events cannot be determined from the published literature.

Author Affiliations: William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Tex (Dr DeZee); National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md (Dr Shimeall); Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC (Drs Douglas and O’Malley); and Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Tex (Dr Shumway).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Oral Vitamin K Versus Placebo to Correct Excessive Anticoagulation in Patients Receiving Warfarin: A Randomized Trial
Crowther et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:293-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Douketis et al.
Chest 2008;133:299S-339S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Excessive Anticoagulant Effect Due to Vitamin K Antagonists
Dentali and Crowther
ASH Education Book 2008;2008:266-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anticoagulants in heart disease: current status and perspectives
De Caterina et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;0:ehl492v1-34.
FULL TEXT  

Treating Excessive Oral Anticoagulation with Vitamin K
JWatch General 2006;2006:3-3.
FULL TEXT