You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 4, February 27, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Benno Brinkhaus, MD; Claudia M. Witt, MD; Susanne Jena, MSc; Klaus Linde, MD; Andrea Streng, PhD; Stefan Wagenpfeil, PhD; Dominik Irnich, MD; Heinz-Ulrich Walther, MD; Dieter Melchart, MD; Stefan N. Willich, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:450-457.

Background:  Acupuncture is widely used by patients with low back pain, although its effectiveness is unclear. We investigated the efficacy of acupuncture compared with minimal acupuncture and with no acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain.

Methods:  Patients were randomized to treatment with acupuncture, minimal acupuncture (superficial needling at nonacupuncture points), or a waiting list control. Acupuncture and minimal acupuncture were administered by specialized acupuncture physicians in 30 outpatient centers, and consisted of 12 sessions per patient over 8 weeks. Patients completed standardized questionnaires at baseline and at 8, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome variable was the change in low back pain intensity from baseline to the end of week 8, as determined on a visual analog scale (range, 0-100 mm).

Results:  A total of 298 patients (67.8% female; mean ± SD age, 59 ± 9 years) were included. Between baseline and week 8, pain intensity decreased by a mean ± SD of 28.7 ± 30.3 mm in the acupuncture group, 23.6 ± 31.0 mm in the minimal acupuncture group, and 6.9 ± 22.0 mm in the waiting list group. The difference for the acupuncture vs minimal acupuncture group was 5.1 mm (95% confidence interval, –3.7 to 13.9 mm; P = .26), and the difference for the acupuncture vs waiting list group was 21.7 mm (95% confidence interval, 13.9-30.0 mm; P<.001). Also, at 26 (P=.96) and 52 (P=.61) weeks, pain did not differ significantly between the acupuncture and the minimal acupuncture groups.

Conclusion:  Acupuncture was more effective in improving pain than no acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic low back pain, whereas there were no significant differences between acupuncture and minimal acupuncture.


Author Affiliations: Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics (Drs Brinkhaus, Witt, Linde, and Willich and Ms Jena) and Center for Musculo-skeletal Surgery (Dr Walther), Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany; Center for Complementary Medicine Research, Department of Internal Medicine II (Drs Linde, Streng, and Melchart) and Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology (Dr Wagenpfeil), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich (Dr Irnich); and Division of Complementary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (Dr Melchart).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

The Acupuncture Randomized Trials Study (Back Pain) Was Unblinded Too Early
Dieter Wettig
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(14):1527-1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Acupuncture Randomized Trials Study (Back Pain) Was Unblinded Too Early—Reply
Benno Brinkhaus, Claudia Witt, Stefan Willich, Klaus Linde, and Dieter Melchart
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(14):1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is Placebo Acupuncture What It is Intended to Be?
Lundeberg et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2009;0:nep049v1-nep049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial Comparing Acupuncture, Simulated Acupuncture, and Usual Care for Chronic Low Back Pain
Cherkin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:858-866.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials
Machado et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:520-527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modellvorhaben Akupunktur - a summary of the ART, ARC and GERAC trials
Cummings
Acupuncture in Medicine 2009;27:26-30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Standardized Transcutaneous Electric Acupoint Stimulation for Relieving Tobacco Urges in Dependent Smokers
Lambert et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2009;0:nen074v3-nen074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The power of context: reconceptualizing the placebo effect
Miller and Kaptchuk
JRSM 2008;101:222-225.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment Of back Pain
CHURCH and ODLE
radtech 2007;79:126-151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline
Chou and Huffman
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:492-504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized, Multicenter, Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial With 3 Groups
Haake et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1892-1898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acupuncture was better than no acupuncture but did not differ from minimal (sham) acupuncture for chronic low back pain at 8 weeks
Parsons
Evid. Based Nurs. 2006;9:111-111.
FULL TEXT  

The Acupuncture Randomized Trials Study (Back Pain) Was Unblinded Too Early--Reply
Brinkhaus et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1528-1528.
FULL TEXT  

The acupuncture randomized trials study (back pain) was unblinded too early.
Wettig
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1527-1528.
FULL TEXT  

West Meets East
JWatch Neurology 2006;2006:12-12.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.