• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (133)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Communication  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Review  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Systematic Review

David I. Shalowitz, AB; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, PhD; David Wendler, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493-497.

Background  Clinicians currently rely on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates to make end-of-life treatment decisions for incapacitated patients. Surrogates are instructed to use the substituted judgment standard, which directs them to make the treatment decision that the patient would have made if he or she were capacitated. However, commentators have questioned the accuracy with which surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences.

Methods  A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and manuscript references, to identify published studies that provide empirical data on how accurately surrogates predict patients' treatment preferences and on the efficacy of commonly proposed methods to improve surrogate accuracy. Two of us (D.I.S. and D.W.) reviewed all articles and extracted data on the hypothetical scenarios used to assess surrogate accuracy and the percentage of agreement between patients and surrogates.

Results  The search identified 16 eligible studies, involving 151 hypothetical scenarios and 2595 surrogate-patient pairs, which collectively analyzed 19 526 patient-surrogate paired responses. Overall, surrogates predicted patients' treatment preferences with 68% accuracy. Neither patient designation of surrogates nor prior discussion of patients' treatment preferences improved surrogates' predictive accuracy.

Conclusions  Patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates incorrectly predict patients' end-of-life treatment preferences in one third of cases. These data undermine the claim that reliance on surrogates is justified by their ability to predict incapacitated patients' treatment preferences. Future studies should assess whether other mechanisms might predict patients' end-of-life treatment preferences more accurately. Also, they should assess whether reliance on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates offers patients and/or their families benefits that are independent of the accuracy of surrogates' decisions.

Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Mr Shalowitz and Dr Wendler); and Division of Biostatistics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Dr Garrett-Mayer).

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Physicians' Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment
Neil J. Farber, Pamela Simpson, Tabassum Salam, Virginia U. Collier, Joan Weiner, and E. Gil Boyer
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):560-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Defining Features of Advance Directives in Law and Clinical Practice
Olick
Chest 2012;141:232-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The role of relatives in decisions concerning life-prolonging treatment in patients with end-stage malignant disorders: informants, advocates or surrogate decision-makers?
Hauke et al.
Ann Oncol 2011;22:2667-2674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Legal Aspects of End-of-Life Care
McGowan
Crit Care Nurse 2011;31:64-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A qualitative investigation of selecting surrogate decision-makers
Edwards et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2011;37:601-605.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Cats with Cancer: An examination of ethical perspectives
Moore
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 2011;13:661-671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Withdrawal of life sustaining therapy after traumatic injury
Weiser and Cooper
Trauma 2011;13:189-198.
ABSTRACT  

Cui bono? Can feminist ethics show a path in complex decision-making where 'classical' theories cannot?
Brierley and Larcher
Clin Ethics 2011;6:86-90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing Life-Sustaining Treatment by Default
Braun and McCullough
Ann Fam Med 2011;9:250-256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Empirical Study of Surrogates' Preferred Level of Control over Value-laden Life Support Decisions in Intensive Care Units
Johnson et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;183:915-921.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Hospice Patients' Goals of Care at the End of Life
Kumar et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2011;28:31-34.
ABSTRACT  

The importance of feeling understood in marital conversations about end-of-life health care
Moorman
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2011;28:100-116.
ABSTRACT  

Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)--Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation
Horner and Minifie
JSLHR 2011;54:S303-S329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes of the General Public Toward Alternative Consent Models
Burns et al.
Am J Crit Care 2011;20:75-83.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Substituted Interests and Best Judgments: An Integrated Model of Surrogate Decision Making
Sulmasy and Snyder
JAMA 2010;304:1946-1947.
FULL TEXT  

Health state preferences and decision-making after malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions
Kelly and Holloway
Neurology 2010;75:682-687.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surviving space-occupying cerebral infarction: A fate worse than death?
van der Worp and Greving
Neurology 2010;75:676-677.
FULL TEXT  

Is Emergency Research Without Initial Consent Justified?: The Consent Substitute Model
Largent et al.
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:668-674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cautionary Tales in the Interpretation of Clinical Studies Involving Older Persons
Scott and Guyatt
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:587-595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concordance of Family and Staff Member Reports About End of Life in Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Rich et al.
The Gerontologist 2010;50:112-120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision-making for patients who lack capacity to decide: the surrogate in the ICU
Rocker et al.
OSH End of Life Care in the ICU 2010;1:med-9780199239245-div1-04-med-9780199239245-div1-04.
FULL TEXT  

5.6 Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining care
Fins and Nilson
Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine 2010;4:med-9780198570295-chapter-med-9780198570295-chapter.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Substituted misjudgement
Woo and Prager
Clin Ethics 2009;4:208-210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Is the Request of a Surrogate Too Unreasonable to Follow?
Prager
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;88:1723-1723.
FULL TEXT  

Reply
D'Amico et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;88:1723-1724.
FULL TEXT  

Surrogate Consent for Genomics Research in Intensive Care
Shelton et al.
Am J Crit Care 2009;18:418-426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Late-Life Parental Death on Adult Sibling Relationships: Do Parents' Advance Directives Help or Hurt?
Khodyakov and Carr
Research on Aging 2009;31:495-519.
ABSTRACT  

Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences?
Moorman et al.
Research on Aging 2009;31:463-491.
ABSTRACT  

Surrogate Decision Makers' Understanding of Dementia Patients' Prior Wishes for End-of-Life Care
Black et al.
J Aging Health 2009;21:627-650.
ABSTRACT  

Surrogate consent for dementia research: A national survey of older Americans
Kim et al.
Neurology 2009;72:149-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continuity of Care and Intensive Care Unit Use at the End of Life
Sharma et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:81-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives and Proxies' Predictions About Patients' Treatment Preferences
Barrio-Cantalejo et al.
Nurs Ethics 2009;16:93-109.
ABSTRACT  

Spouses' Effectiveness as End-of-Life Health Care Surrogates: Accuracy, Uncertainty, and Errors of Overtreatment or Undertreatment
Moorman and Carr
The Gerontologist 2008;48:811-819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Uncovering Beliefs and Barriers: Staff Attitudes Related to Advance Directives
Bergman-Evans et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2008;25:347-353.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Information and Care Planning in Cancer Care
Walling et al.
JCO 2008;26:3896-3902.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient and Surrogate Disagreement in End-of-Life Decisions: Can Surrogates Accurately Predict Patients' Preferences?
Marks and Arkes
Med Decis Making 2008;28:524-531.
ABSTRACT  

Surrogate Decision Making: Reconciling Ethical Theory and Clinical Practice
Berger et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:48-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nurses' Conceptions of Decision Making Concerning Life-Sustaining Treatment
Silen et al.
Nurs Ethics 2008;15:160-173.
ABSTRACT  

Stability and Change in Patient Preferences and Spouse Substituted Judgments Regarding Dialysis Continuation
Pruchno et al.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008;63:S81-S91.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life: A Systematic Review
Lorenz et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:147-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using Video Images of Dementia in Advance Care Planning
Volandes et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:828-833.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Update in Critical Care 2006
Milbrandt et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:638-648.
FULL TEXT