This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Correction  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Ethics  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Neil J. Farber, MD; Pamela Simpson, MD; Tabassum Salam, MD; Virginia U. Collier, MD; Joan Weiner, PhD; E. Gil Boyer, EdD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:560-564.

Background  Few data are available about physicians' decisions in regard to withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining measures. We therefore studied internists' views on this subject.

Methods  We surveyed 1000 generalist and subspecialist internists about their views on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Thirty-two hypothetical cases were included. The effect of the demographic data on withholding or withdrawing treatment was analyzed via analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression.

Results  Of 1000 internists, 407 (41%) completed and returned surveys. A majority of respondents (51%) were willing to withhold or withdraw treatment in all 32 scenarios; 49% were unwilling to withhold or withdraw in at least 1 scenario. Respondents were likely to withhold treatment in 14 of 16 scenarios compared with 13.7 of 16 scenarios for withdrawing treatments (P<.001). Respondents withheld or withdrew feeding tubes in 6.6 of 8 scenarios (P<.001) and antibiotics in 6.7 of 8 scenarios (P = .001) compared with ventilators (7.1 of 8 scenarios) and dialysis (7.3 of 8 scenarios). Respondents were less likely to withhold or withdraw treatments in nonterminally ill (12.9 of 16 scenarios) (P = .02) and alert patients (13.2 of 16 scenarios) (P<.001) compared with terminally ill patients (14.9 of 16 scenarios) and patients with dementia (14.5 of 16 scenarios).

Conclusions  A large percentage of internists would be unwilling to adhere to some of patients' wishes to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The clinical scenario and type of treatment affect internists' decisions about whether they would withhold or withdraw such treatment.

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Del (Drs Farber, Simpson, Salam, and Collier); and Management Department, Drexel University (Dr Weiner), and New University Research Group (Dr Boyer), Philadelphia, Pa.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers: A Systematic Review
David I. Shalowitz, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, and David Wendler
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Should implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and permanent pacemakers in patients with terminal illness be deactivated?: Patient Autonomy Is Paramount
Zellner et al.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:340-344.
FULL TEXT  

Surrogate Decision Making: Reconciling Ethical Theory and Clinical Practice
Berger et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:48-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West
Mobeireek et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:225-229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review
VanGeest et al.
Eval Health Prof 2007;30:303-321.
ABSTRACT  

Update in Critical Care 2006
Milbrandt et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:638-648.
FULL TEXT