You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 7, April 10, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Anesthesia
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Terminal Sedation and Euthanasia

A Comparison of Clinical Practices

Judith A. C. Rietjens, PhD; Johannes J. M. van Delden, MD, PhD; Agnes van der Heide, MD, PhD; Astrid M. Vrakking, MSc; Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, PhD; Paul J. van der Maas, MD, PhD; Gerrit van der Wal, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:749-753.

Background  An important issue in the debate about terminal sedation is the extent to which it differs from euthanasia. We studied clinical differences and similarities between both practices in the Netherlands.

Methods  Personal interviews were held with a nationwide stratified sample of 410 physicians (response rate, 85%) about the most recent cases in which they used terminal sedation, defined as administering drugs to keep the patient continuously in deep sedation or coma until death without giving artificial nutrition or hydration (n = 211), or performed euthanasia, defined as administering a lethal drug at the request of a patient with the explicit intention to hasten death (n = 123). We compared characteristics of the patients, the decision-making process, and medical care of both practices.

Results  Terminal sedation and euthanasia both mostly concerned patients with cancer. Patients receiving terminal sedation were more often anxious (37%) and confused (24%) than patients receiving euthanasia (15% and 2%, respectively). Euthanasia requests were typically related to loss of dignity and a sense of suffering without improving, whereas requesting terminal sedation was more often related to severe pain. Physicians applying terminal sedation estimated that the patient's life had been shortened by more than 1 week in 27% of cases, compared with 73% in euthanasia cases.

Conclusions  Terminal sedation and euthanasia both are often applied to address severe suffering in terminally ill patients. However, terminal sedation is typically used to address severe physical and psychological suffering in dying patients, whereas perceived loss of dignity during the last phase of life is a major problem for patients requesting euthanasia.


Author Affiliations: Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Rietjens, van der Heide, and van der Maas and Ms Vrakking); University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Dr van Delden); and Department of Public and Occupational Health and Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Onwuteaka-Philipsen and van der Wal).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Morphine Is Not a Sedative and Does Not Shorten Life
Erwin J. O. Kompanje, Lia van Zuylen, and C. C. D. (Karin) van der Rijt
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(18):2047.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Morphine Is Not a Sedative and Does Not Shorten Life—Reply
Judith A. C. Rietjens, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Agnes van der Heide, Astrid M. Vrakking, Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Paul J. van der Maas, and Gerrit van der Wal
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(18):2047-2048.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Deciding about continuous deep sedation: physicians' perspectives: A focus group study
Rietjens et al.
Palliat Med 2009;23:410-417.
ABSTRACT  

Palliative sedation therapy does not hasten death: results from a prospective multicenter study
Maltoni et al.
Ann Oncol 2009;20:1163-1169.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changed Patterns in Dutch Palliative Sedation Practices After the Introduction of a National Guideline
Hasselaar et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:430-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inappropriateness of using opioids for end-stage palliative sedation: a Dutch study
Reuzel et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:641-646.
ABSTRACT  

Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
Rietjens et al.
BMJ 2008;336:810-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Prescription in Palliative Sedation: Compliance With Dutch Guidelines
Hasselaar et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1166-1171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Practices in the Netherlands under the Euthanasia Act
van der Heide et al.
NEJM 2007;356:1957-1965.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Terminal sedation: source of a restless ethical debate
van Delden
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:187-188.
FULL TEXT  

Morphine is not a sedative and does not shorten life.
Kompanje et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2047-2047.
FULL TEXT  

Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making
Rietjens et al.
Palliat Med 2006;20:685-692.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.