This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Vascular Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Comparing the Risk Indexes

Matthew J. Press, MD; Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH; Jason Wang, PhD; Stanley Tuhrim, MD; Ethan A. Halm, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:914-920.

Background  Several generic cardiac risk assessment tools predict perioperative cardiac complications, but their ability to predict a broader range of medical, neurologic, and surgical complications is unknown.

Methods  A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study of 1998 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Complications within 30 days of surgery were assessed by medical record review, including death or nonfatal stroke and cardiac, noncardiac medical, minor neurologic, and wound complications. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses assessed the predictive abilities of the Goldman, Detsky, Revised Cardiac Risk, and American Society of Anesthesiologists indexes and of 2 CEA-specific risk models (the Halm and Tu scores).

Results  Death or stroke occurred in 3.2% of patients, cardiac complications in 4.0%, noncardiac medical complications in 3.2%, minor neurologic complications in 6.9%, and wound complications in 6.0%. All risk models (except the Tu score) significantly predicted cardiac complications equally well (P<.05). All 6 risk models were equivalent in predicting noncardiac medical complications. Only the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and the 2 CEA-specific risk models (Halm and Tu scores) predicted death or stroke and minor neurologic and wound complications. The Halm score was superior in predicting death or stroke compared with the Tu score and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.72 vs 0.62 and 0.61, respectively; P<.05). Patients with cardiac, noncardiac medical, minor neurologic, or wound complications had 3- to 16-fold increased odds of death or stroke.

Conclusion  The Halm score CEA-specific risk model and the generic Revised Cardiac Risk Index predicted a broad range of medical, neurologic, and surgical complications following CEA.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Health Policy (Drs Press, Chassin, Wang, Tuhrim, and Halm), General Internal Medicine (Dr Halm), and Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY (Dr Tuhrim); and Brown Medical School, Providence, RI (Dr Press).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Systematic Review of the Operative Risks of Carotid Endarterectomy for Recently Symptomatic Stenosis in Relation to the Timing of Surgery
Rerkasem and Rothwell
Stroke 2009;40:e564-e572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perioperative Complications After Vascular Surgery Are Predicted by the Revised Cardiac Risk Index But Are Not Reduced in High-Risk Subsets With Preoperative Revascularization
Garcia et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:73-77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors for Perioperative Death and Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy: Results of the New York Carotid Artery Surgery Study
Halm et al.
Stroke 2009;40:221-229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Wolff et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:860-870.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Update in General Internal Medicine
Harrington and Munekata
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:104-116.
FULL TEXT  

Risk Models Help Predict Complications of Carotid Endarterectomy
JWatch Neurology 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT