You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 166 No. 9, May 8, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Sleep Apnea
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea

Najib T. Ayas, MD, MPH; J. Mark FitzGerald, MD; John A. Fleetham, MD; David P. White, MD; Michael Schulzer, MD, PhD; C. Frank Ryan, MD; Reza Ghaeli, PhD; G. William Mercer, PhD; Peter Cooper, BASc; Michael C. Y. Tan, MA, MSc; Carlo A. Marra, PharmD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:977-984.

Background  Obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea (OSAH) is a common disorder characterized by recurrent collapse of the upper airway during sleep, and is associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). Common first-line therapy for OSAH is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of CPAP therapy vs none for the treatment of OSAH.

Methods  We used a 5-year Markov model that considers the costs and quality-of-life improvements of CPAP therapy, accounting for the gains from reduced MVC rates. Utility values were obtained from published studies. The MVC rates under the CPAP and no-CPAP scenarios were calculated from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data and a systematic review of published studies. Costs of MVCs, equipment, and physicians were obtained from US Medicare and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The target population included male and female patients aged 25 to 54 years and newly diagnosed as having moderate to severe OSAH. We examined the findings from the perspectives of a third-party payer and society.

Results  From a third-party payer or a societal perspective, CPAP therapy was more effective but more costly than no CPAP, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $3354 or $314 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimate was most dependent on viewpoint (varying more than 10-fold between societal and third-party payer perspectives) and choice of utility measurement method (varying more than 5-fold between the use of standard gamble and EuroQol 5D utility assessment values).

Conclusion  When quality of life, costs of therapy, and MVC outcomes are considered, CPAP therapy for patients with OSAH is economically attractive.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine and Division of Respiratory Medicine (Drs Ayas, FitzGerald, Fleetham, and Ryan), Applied Research and Evaluation Services (Dr Mercer), and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Dr Marra), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Sleep Disorders Program, Vancouver Acute Hospitals, Vancouver (Drs Ayas, Fleetham, and Ryan); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver (Drs Ayas, FitzGerald, Schulzer, and Marra and Mr Tan); Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Ghaeli and Mr Cooper); and Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (Dr White).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Public health and legal implications of OSA
Mwenge and Rodenstein
Sleep Apnoea 2010;1:216-224.
ABSTRACT  

Oral appliances
Fleetham and Almeida
Sleep Apnoea 2010;1:267-285.
ABSTRACT  

Does Medicare Have an Implicit Cost-Effectiveness Threshold?
Chambers et al.
Med Decis Making 2010;30:E14-E27.
ABSTRACT  

Pressure Reduction During Exhalation in Sleep Apnea Patients Treated by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Pepin et al.
Chest 2009;136:490-497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk and severity of motor vehicle crashes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea
Mulgrew et al.
Thorax 2008;63:536-541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease
Amit Benjamin and Lewis
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:15-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Split-Night Polysomnography
Patel et al.
Chest 2007;132:1664-1671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sleep apnoea as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: current evidence, basic mechanisms and research priorities
McNicholas et al.
Eur Respir J 2007;29:156-178.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CPAP for OSA is cost effective
Hands
Thorax 2006;61:999-999.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.