You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 1, January 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

External Validity of Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Philippe Gabriel Steg, MD; José López-Sendón, MD; Esteban Lopez de Sa, MD; Shaun G. Goodman, MD; Joel M. Gore, MD; Frederick A. Anderson Jr, PhD; Dominique Himbert, MD; Jeanna Allegrone, MS; Frans Van de Werf, MD; for the GRACE Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(1):68-73.

Background  Patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) may not reflect those seen in real-life practice. Our goal was to compare patients eligible for enrollment but not enrolled in contemporary RCTs of reperfusion therapy with patients who would have been ineligible and also with patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) participating in RCTs.

Methods  Consecutive patients with AMI (n = 8469) enrolled in the GRACE registry (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) were divided into 3 groups: RCT participants (11%; n = 953), eligible nonenrolled patients (55%; n = 4669), and ineligible patients (34%; n = 2847). Our main outcome measures were hospital mortality rates.

Results  Based on baseline characteristics or GRACE risk-score distribution, RCT participants had the lowest a priori risk of death; eligible patients had a higher risk; and ineligible patients had the highest risk. Actual hospital mortality showed a similar gradient (3.6%, 7.1%, and 11.4%, respectively) (P<.001). Multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline risk, use and type of reperfusion therapy, and delay from symptom onset to admission consistently showed a higher mortality rate for eligible nonenrolled patients than for RCT participants (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.43; and odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.13, respectively).

Conclusions  Patients with AMI participating in RCTs have a lower baseline risk and experience lower mortality than nonenrolled patients, even when they are trial eligible. This difference is not entirely explained by differences in baseline risk, use and type of reperfusion therapy, and/or delays in presentation. Caution is necessary when extending the findings obtained in RCTs to the general population with AMI.


Author Affiliations: Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France (Drs Steg and Himbert); Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain (Drs López-Sendón and Lopez de Sa); Canadian Heart Research Centre and Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Goodman); Department of Medicine (Dr Gore) and Center for Outcomes Research (Dr Anderson and Ms Allegrone), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; and Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Van de Werf).
Group Information: A complete list of the GRACE Investigators can be found at http://www.outcomes-umassmed.org/grace.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

"False-Positive" Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation Among Patients With Suspected ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Larson et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2754-2760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Comorbidity Account for the Excess Mortality in Patients With Major Bleeding in Acute Myocardial Infarction?
Spencer et al.
Circulation 2007;116:2793-2801.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
Krumholz and Masoudi
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2254-2262.
FULL TEXT  

Propofol Associated with a Shorter Duration of Mechanical Ventilation than Scheduled Intermittent Lorazepam: A Database Analysis Using Project IMPACT
Fong et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2007;41:1986-1991.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiovascular disease on a global scale: defining the path forward for research and practice
Mark et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2678-2684.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Regional System to Provide Timely Access to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Henry et al.
Circulation 2007;116:721-728.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major bleeding after PCI. Where is our crystal ball?
Spencer and Steg
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1917-1919.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.