You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 1, January 8, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Thrombolysis in Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Daniella J. Perlroth, MD; Gillian D. Sanders, PhD; Michael K. Gould, MD, MS

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(1):74-80.

Background  Thrombolytic therapy is controversial in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism.

Methods  We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to compare health effects and costs of treatment with alteplase plus heparin sodium vs heparin alone in hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction by developing a Markov model and using data from clinical trials and administrative sources.

Results  Based on data from a recent randomized trial, we assumed that the risk of clinical deterioration requiring treatment escalation was almost 3 times higher in patients who received heparin alone (23.2% vs 7.6%) but that the risk of death was equal in the 2 cohorts (2.7%). Based on registry data, we assumed that the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was approximately 3 times higher in patients who received alteplase plus heparin (1.2% vs 0.4%). Under these and other assumptions, thrombolysis resulted in marginally higher total lifetime health care costs ($43 900 vs $43 300) and was slightly less effective (10.52 vs 10.57 quality-adjusted life-years) than treatment with heparin alone. Thrombolysis was more effective and cost less than $50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained when we assumed that the baseline risk of death in the heparin group was 3 times the base-case value (8.1%) and that alteplase reduced the relative risk of death by at least 10%.

Conclusions  Available data do not support the routine use of thrombolysis to treat patients with submassive pulmonary embolism. However, thrombolysis may prove to be cost-effective in selected subgroups of hemodynamically stable patients in whom the risk of death is higher.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (Drs Perlroth and Gould); Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Sanders); and Medical Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (Dr Gould).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Thrombolytic Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Ibrahim et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2183-2190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thrombolysis for Pulmonary Embolus: How Good Is It?
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.