You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 10, May 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management Patterns in Relation to Risk Stratification Among Patients With Non–ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Andrew T. Yan, MD; Raymond T. Yan, MD; Mary Tan, BSc; Anthony Fung, MBBS; Eric A. Cohen, MD; David H. Fitchett, MD; Anatoly Langer, MSc, MD; Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc; for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes 1 and 2 Registry Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(10):1009-1016.

Background  Randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy of an early invasive management strategy for high-risk non–ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). We examined the use of in-hospital cardiac catheterization and medications in relation to risk across the broad spectrum of non–ST elevation ACSs.

Methods  We evaluated 4414 patients with non–ST elevation ACSs in the prospective, multicenter, Canadian ACS 1 (September 1, 1999–June 30, 2001) and ACS 2 (October 1, 2002–December 31, 2003) Registries. Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on tertiles of the calculated Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (a validated predictor of in-hospital mortality).

Results  Although in-hospital mortality rates were similar, the in-hospital use of cardiac catheterization increased significantly over time (38.8% in the ACS 1 Registry vs 63.5% in the ACS 2 Registry; P<.001). The rates of cardiac catheterization in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 48.0%, 41.1%, and 27.3% in the ACS 1 Registry, and 73.8%, 66.9%, and 49.7% in the ACS 2 Registry, respectively (P<.001 for trend for both). After adjusting for other confounders, intermediate-risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.90; P<.001) and high-risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.45; P<.001) patients remained less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization compared with low-risk patients. Furthermore, there existed a similar inverse relationship between risk and the use of in-hospital revascularization and medications.

Conclusions  Despite temporal increases in the use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization in the management of non–ST elevation ACSs, evidence-based invasive and pharmacological therapies remain paradoxically targeted toward low-risk patients. Strategies to eliminate this treatment-risk paradox must be implemented to fully realize the benefits and optimize the cost-effectiveness of invasive management.


Author Affiliations: Canadian Heart Research Centre, Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, and Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto (Drs A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, Fitchett, Langer, and Goodman and Ms Tan), and Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre (Dr Cohen), Toronto, Ontario; and Division of Cardiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia (Dr Fung).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Vitamin D Level, Respiratory Tract Infections, and Controlled Trials—Reply
Adit A. Ginde, Jonathan M. Mansbach, and Carlos A. Camargo, Jr
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1443-1444.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Exploring the Treatment-Risk Paradox in Coronary Disease
Finlay A. McAlister, Antigone Oreopoulos, Colleen M. Norris, Michelle M. Graham, Ross T. Tsuyuki, Merril Knudtson, William A. Ghali, and for the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(10):1019-1025.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Translating Evidence Into Practice: Are We Neglecting the Neediest?
John A. Spertus and Mark I. Furman
Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(10):987-988.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Conservative Medical Management in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes in Gulf RACE-2
AlHabib et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2012;63:109-118.
ABSTRACT  

Adjustment of the GRACE score by growth differentiation factor 15 enables a more accurate appreciation of risk in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Widera et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;0:ehr444v1-ehr444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Myocardial Infarction Guideline Adherence as a Function of Patient Risk: An End to Paradoxical Care?
Motivala et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1760-1765.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between risk stratification at admission and treatment effects of early invasive management following fibrinolysis: insights from the Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting After Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI)
Yan et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;32:1994-2002.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utilization and Determinants of In-Hospital Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome From the Middle East
Panduranga et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2010;61:744-750.
ABSTRACT  

Optimal Medical Therapy for Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Exploring Why Physicians Do Not Prescribe Evidence-Based Treatment and Why Patients Discontinue Medications After Discharge
Bagnall et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:530-537.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment and Risk in Heart Failure: Gaps in Evidence or Quality?
Peterson et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:309-315.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants of Cardiac Catheterization Use in Older Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ko et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:54-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vision and Creation of the American Heart Association Pharmaceutical Roundtable Outcomes Research Centers
Peterson et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:663-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Concentration on More Intensive Treatment for Younger Patients More Rational and Humane Than Ignorant?--Reply
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1442-1443.
FULL TEXT  

Temporal management patterns and outcomes of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in patients with kidney dysfunction
Wong et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:549-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding Physicians' Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Canadian ACS 2 Registry
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:372-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Temporal Trends and Improved Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Nonagenarians
From et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:692-698.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are acute coronary syndromes risk models too complex? reply
Yan et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2176-2177.
FULL TEXT  

The Treatment-Risk Paradox: More Complex Than We Think
JWatch Emergency Med. 2007;2007:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

The Treatment-Risk Paradox in Cardiology
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Translating Evidence Into Practice: Are We Neglecting the Neediest?
Spertus and Furman
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:987-988.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.