• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (20)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Alexia M. Torke, MD; G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS; John Lantos, MD; Mark Siegler, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(11):1117-1121.

The physician-patient relationship is a cornerstone of the medical encounter and has been analyzed extensively. But in many cases, this relationship is altered because patients are unable to make decisions for themselves. In such cases, physicians rely on surrogates, who are often asked to "speak for the patient." This view overlooks the fundamental fact that the surrogate decision maker cannot be just a passive spokesperson for the patient but is also an active agent who develops a complex relationship with the physician. Although there has been much analysis of the ethical guidelines by which surrogates should make decisions, there has been little previous analysis of the special features of the physician-surrogate relationship. Such an analysis seems crucial as the population ages and life-sustaining technologies improve, which is likely to make surrogate decision making even more common. We outline key issues affecting the physician-surrogate relationship and provide guidance for physicians who are making decisions with surrogates.

Author Affiliations: MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (Drs Torke, Alexander, Lantos, and Siegler), and Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine (Drs Torke, Alexander, and Siegler), and Department of Pediatrics (Dr Lantos), University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Physicians and Decision Making in Dementia
Renzo Rozzini and Marco Trabucchi
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):241.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians and Decision Making in Dementia—Reply
Alexia Torke, G. Caleb Alexander, John Lantos, and Mark Siegler
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):242.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Redefining the "Planning" in Advance Care Planning: Preparing for End-of-Life Decision Making
Sudore and Fried
ANN INTERN MED 2010;153:256-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reconceptualizing the Experience of Surrogate Decision Making: Reports vs Genuine Decisions
Braun et al.
Ann Fam Med 2009;7:249-253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical Guidance for Evidence-Based ICU Family Conferences
Curtis and White
Chest 2008;134:835-843.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meeting Physicians' Responsibilities in Providing End-of-Life Care
Shanawani et al.
Chest 2008;133:775-786.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians and Decision Making in Dementia
Rozzini and Trabucchi
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:241-241.
FULL TEXT