You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 16, September 10, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical Decision Making for Patients Without Surrogates

Sumeeta Varma, BS; David Wendler, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1711-1715.

Patients who lose decision-making capacity and lack advance directives and next of kin present a quandary for physicians. Current mechanisms for making treatment decisions for these patients rely on decision makers, such as courts, public guardians, committees, and physicians, who typically do not have sufficient knowledge to predict the patients' preferences. Thus, these mechanisms likely yield decisions that are inconsistent with patients' treatment preferences in many cases. A population-based treatment indicator is a computer-based tool that predicts which treatment a given patient would prefer based on the treatment preferences of similar patients in similar situations. A recent analysis suggests that a population-based treatment indicator could predict patient preferences as accurately as patient-appointed surrogates and next of kin. This analysis suggests that a population-based treatment indicator may provide a mechanism to respect the treatment preferences of patients without surrogates and ensure that their treatment preferences are respected as much as the preferences of patients who have surrogates. Collection of data on patients' treatment preferences, especially those without surrogates, incorporation of these data into a treatment indicator, and exploration of ways to implement this approach for patients without surrogates are called for.


Author Affiliations: Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Neither Freedom nor Autonomy Without Beneficence
Ernesto d’Aloja, Michela Pintor, Francesco Paribello, and Salvatore Pisu
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):548-549.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How Much Do Patients' Preferences Contribute To Resource Use?
Anthony et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:864-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neither Freedom nor Autonomy Without Beneficence
d'Aloja et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:548-549.
FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives: Know What You Want, Get What You Need
Cohen
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1460-1462.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.