You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 2, January 22, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outpatient Hypertension Treatment, Treatment Intensification, and Control in Western Europe and the United States

Y. Richard Wang, MD, PhD; G. Caleb Alexander, MD, MS; Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2):141-147.

Background  Hypertension guidelines in the United States tend to have more aggressive treatment recommendations than those in European countries.

Methods  To explore international differences in hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and hypertension control in western Europe and the United States, we conducted cross-sectional analyses of the nationally representative CardioMonitor 2004 survey, which included 21 053 hypertensive patients visiting 291 cardiologists and 1284 primary care physicians in 5 western European countries and the United States. The main outcome measures were latest systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) levels, hypertension control (latest BP level, <140/90 mm Hg), and medication increase (dose escalation or an addition to or switch of drug therapy) for inadequately controlled hypertension.

Results  At least 92% of patients in each country received antihypertensive drug treatment. The initial pretreatment BP levels were lowest and the use of combination drug therapy (≥2 antihypertensive drug classes) was highest in the United States. Multivariate analyses controlling for age, sex, current smoking, and physician specialty indicated that, compared with US patients, European patients had higher latest systolic BP levels (by 5.3-10.2 mm Hg across countries examined) and diastolic BP levels (by 1.9-5.3 mm Hg), a smaller likelihood of hypertension control (odds ratios, 0.27-0.50), and a smaller likelihood of medication increase for inadequately controlled hypertension (odds ratios, 0.29-0.65) (all P<.001). In addition, controlling for initial pretreatment BP level attenuated the differences in latest systolic and diastolic BP levels and the likelihood of hypertension control.

Conclusion  Lower treatment thresholds and more intensive treatment contribute to better hypertension control in the United States compared with the western European countries studied.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital (Dr Wang), and Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania (Dr Wang), Philadelphia; Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals, and Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (Dr Alexander); and Program on Prevention Outcomes and Practices, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (Dr Stafford).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cancer Screening And Age In The United States And Europe
Howard et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:1838-1847.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The impact of the Canadian Hypertension Education Programme in its first decade
McAlister et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:1434-1439.
FULL TEXT  

Managing cardiovascular and renal risk: the potential of direct renin inhibition
Sever et al.
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System 2009;10:65-76.
ABSTRACT  

Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006
Falaschetti et al.
Hypertension 2009;53:480-486.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Globalization of Blood Pressure Control
Escobar and Barrios
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:314-315.
FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren: A 12-Month Randomized, Double-Blind Comparator Trial With Hydrochlorothiazide
Schmieder et al.
Circulation 2009;119:417-425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control in Dallas County, Texas
Victor et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1285-1293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Response to Gender and Blood Pressure Control
Scobie et al.
Hypertension 2008;51:e49-e49.
FULL TEXT  

Screening, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in US Private Physician Offices, 2003-2004
Ma and Stafford
Hypertension 2008;51:1275-1281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Novel Use of Kaplan-Meier Methods to Explain Age and Gender Differences in Hypertension Control Rates
Bailey et al.
Hypertension 2008;51:841-847.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.