You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 20, November 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Impact of an Automated Test Results Management System on Patients' Satisfaction About Test Result Communication

Michael E. Matheny, MD, MS, MPH; Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPH; E. John Orav, PhD; Zahra Ladak-Merchant, BDS, MPH; David W. Bates, MS, MD; Gilad J. Kuperman, MD, PhD; Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(20):2233-2239.

Background  Few reliable and efficient systems support the communication of test results to outpatients, and this may lead to patient dissatisfaction with test result communication. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of physicians' use of a test results management tool embedded in an electronic health record on patient satisfaction with test result communication.

Methods  A prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled trial of 570 patient encounters in 26 outpatient primary care practices was performed from December 1, 2002, to April 31, 2005. Physicians in the intervention practices were trained and given access to a physician test results management tool with imbedded patient notification functions to evaluate whether patient satisfaction with communication of test results ordered by the primary care provider was improved. Patient satisfaction surveys were conducted by telephone after the patient underwent the test and were administered before and after the intervention in both arms.

Results  The survey response rate after successful patient contact was 74.2% (570/768). After adjusting for patient age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, and insurance type, the intervention significantly increased patient satisfaction with test results communication (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-5.25; P = .03). In addition, patients in the postintervention group were more satisfied with information given them for medical treatments and conditions regarding their results (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-9.17; P = .02).

Conclusion  An automated test results management system can improve patient satisfaction with communication of test results ordered by their primary care provider and can improve patient satisfaction with the communication of information regarding their condition and treatment plans.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00225628


Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine (Drs Matheny, Gandhi, Orav, Bates, and Poon and Ms Ladak-Merchant) and Decision Systems Group (Dr Matheny), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Quality Assurance, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York (Dr Kuperman).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.