This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Men's Health  • Prostate Disease  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Wildon R. Farwell, MD, MPH; Jeffrey A. Linder, MD, MPH; Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2497-2502.

Background  The utility of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test to screen for prostate cancer has been widely debated for several years. Whether PSA testing rates have changed during this period of controversy is not well known.

Methods  We examined the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (1995-2004) of visits to primary care providers by healthy men aged 35 years or older. We examined visits by calendar year and compared the years 2000 through 2004 with the years 1995 through 1999. We also examined visits by men in the overall population and in particular subgroups.

Results  Primary care physicians ordered PSA tests in 4.7% of all visits in 1995 and in 7.0% of all visits in 2004 (P = .03). In multivariate analysis, the odds of a primary care physician ordering a PSA test during any clinic visit increased 8% (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12; P < .001) per year from 1995 through 2004. The increase was more pronounced among men making visits for general medical examinations (11.2% in 1995 vs 32.3% in 2004; P = .003). Comparing the period 2000-2004 with the period 1995-1999, the odds of PSA testing increased in nearly all subgroups but most dramatically in black men (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8; P = .002) and in men 35 through 49 years of age (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6; P = .001).

Conclusion  In a nationally representative sample, we found that despite the lack of clear evidence of benefit, PSA testing for prostate cancer screening has increased dramatically, especially among black men and younger men.

Author Affiliations: Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System (Drs Farwell and Jha), Divisions of Aging (Dr Farwell) and General Medicine and Primary Care (Drs Linder and Jha), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health (Dr Jha), Boston, Massachusetts.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial
Stark et al.
BMJ 2009;339:b3601-b3601.
FULL TEXT  

Cancer Statistics, 2009
Jemal et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control
Jemal et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:1672-1694.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of Decision Aids: A Review of the Evidence
Leatherman and Warrick
Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:79S-116S.
ABSTRACT  

Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Lin et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:192-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT