This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice, Other  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Update for the 21st-Century Consultant

Stephen M. Salerno, MD, MPH; Frank P. Hurst, MD; Stephanie Halvorson, MD; Donna L. Mercado, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):271-275.

Background  Little information in the literature exists to guide consult interactions between different medical specialties.

Methods  A total of 323 general internists, family medicine physicians, general surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) from 3 academic medical centers completed a survey addressing their ideal relationship with consultants. Differences between surgeons and nonsurgeons were calculated using logistic regression, adjusting for location and trainee status. Differences between different specialties of surgeons were calculated using analysis of variance with Scheffe post hoc analysis

Results  There was a 72% response rate. About half of respondents were surgeons and the rest were general internists and family medicine physicians. More nonsurgeons (69%) desired the consultant to focus on a narrow question than did surgeons (41%). Over half (59%) of family medicine physicians and internists preferred to retain order-writing authority on their patients compared with 37% of surgeons (P<.001). Of the surgeons preferring to retain authority, 70% believed it was appropriate for consultants to write orders after a verbal discussion. Orthopedic surgeons desired consultants to write orders and comanage patients significantly more compared with general surgeons and OB/GYNs (P<.001). Only 29% of physicians thought literature references were useful in consultations. Most physicians (75%) desired direct verbal communication with the specialist providing the consultation. Most family physicians (78%) believed there was little need for general internal medicine input, preferring to consult medicine subspecialists directly.

Conclusions  Specialty-dependent differences exist in consult preferences of physicians. These differences vary from the extremes of orthopedic surgeons desiring a comprehensive comanagement approach with the consultant to general internists and family medicine physicians desiring to retain control over order writing and have a more focused consultant approach.

Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii (Drs Salerno and Hurst); Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (Dr Halvorson); and Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Mass (Dr Mercado).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors and outcomes associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients
Sellier et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;0:dkp406v1-dkp406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using Computerized Provider Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support to Improve Referring Physicians' Implementation of Consultants' Medical Recommendations
Were et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16:196-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Audit of the consultation process on general internal medicine services
Conley et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:59-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT