You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 3, February 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Contraception
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Oral Contraceptives and the Absolute Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Women With Single or Multiple Thrombophilic Defects

Results From a Retrospective Family Cohort Study

Elizabeth F. W. van Vlijmen, MD; Jan-Leendert P. Brouwer, MD; Nic J. G. M. Veeger, MSc; Tom K. A. B. Eskes, MD, PhD; Pieter A. de Graeff, MD, PhD; Jan van der Meer, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(3):282-289.

Background  The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women taking combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is attributed to changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis. Their impact may be greater in women with preexistent thrombophilic defects.

Methods  We assessed the effects of COCs on absolute VTE risk in women with single or multiple thrombophilic defects in a retrospective family cohort study. Female relatives of probands with VTE and hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin were tested for known thrombophilic defects, including the index deficiency. Absolute incidences of VTE were compared in deficient vs nondeficient women, in deficient and nondeficient women who ever or never used COCs, and in deficient and nondeficient women with 0, 1, or more than 1 other thrombophilic defect during exposure to COCs.

Results  Of 222 women, 135 (61%) ever used COCs. Overall, annual incidences of VTE were 1.64% and 0.18% in deficient and nondeficient women, respectively; the adjusted relative risk was 11.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-36.2). The risk was comparable in deficient ever and never users (1.73% vs 1.54%). Annual incidences during actual COC use were 4.62% in deficient women and 0.48% in nondeficient women; the relative risk was 9.7 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-42.4). The incidence increased by concomitant thrombophilic defects, from 3.49% to 12.00% in deficient women and from 0% to 3.13% in nondeficient women.

Conclusions  Women with hereditary deficiencies of protein S, protein C, or antithrombin are at high risk of VTE during use of COCs, particularly when other thrombophilic defects are present. They have VTE at a younger age, but the overall risk is not increased by COCs.


Author Affiliations: Division of Haemostasis, Thrombosis and Rheology, Department of Hematology (Drs van Vlijmen, Brouwer, and van der Meer), and Departments of Epidemiology (Mr Veeger) and Clinical Pharmacology (Dr de Graeff), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen (Dr Eskes), the Netherlands.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Venous thromboembolism in women
Rathbun
Vasc Med 2008;13:255-266.
ABSTRACT  

Thrombophilia: Common Questions on Laboratory Assessment and Management
Heit
ASH Education Book 2007;2007:127-135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.