You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 5, March 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians and Electronic Health Records

A Statewide Survey

Steven R. Simon, MD, MPH; Rainu Kaushal, MD, MPH; Paul D. Cleary, PhD; Chelsea A. Jenter, MPH; Lynn A. Volk, MHS; E. John Orav, PhD; Elisabeth Burdick, MS; Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH; David W. Bates, MSc, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):507-512.

Background  Electronic health records (EHRs) allow for a variety of functions, ranging from visit documentation to laboratory test ordering, but little is known about physicians' actual use of these functions.

Methods  We surveyed a random sample of 1884 physicians in Massachusetts by mail and assessed availability and use of EHR functions, predictors of use, and the relationships between EHR use and physicians' perceptions of medical practice.

Results  A total of 1345 physicians responded to the survey (71.4% response rate), and 387 (28.8%) reported that their practice had adopted EHRs. More than 80% of physicians with EHRs reported having the ability to view laboratory reports (84.8%) and document visits electronically (84.0%), but considerably fewer reported being able to order laboratory tests electronically (46.8%) or transmit prescriptions to a pharmacy electronically (44.7%). Fewer than half of the physicians who had systems with clinical decision support, transmittal of electronic prescriptions, and radiology order entry actually used these functions most or all of the time. Compared with physicians who had not adopted EHRs, EHR users reported more positive views of the effects of computers on health care; there were no significant differences in these attitudes between high and low users of EHRs. Overall, about 1 in 4 physicians reported dissatisfaction with medical practice; there was no difference in this measure by EHR adoption or use.

Conclusions  There is considerable variability in the functions available in EHRs and in the extent to which physicians use them. Future work should emphasize factors that affect the use of available functions.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Ambulatory Care and Prevention (Dr Simon) and Health Care Policy (Dr Cleary), Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Dr Simon); Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (Drs Kaushal, Orav, and Bates, and Mss Jenter and Burdick); and Department of Clinical and Quality Analysis, Partners HealthCare System, Inc (Ms Volk and Drs Poon and Bates), Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors associated with difficult electronic health record implementation in office practice
Fleurant et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;0:amiajnl-2011-000689v1-amiajnl-2011-000689.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support
Augestad et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:13-21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Massachusetts E-Health Project Increased Physicians' Ability To Use Registries, And Signals Progress Toward Better Care
Fleurant et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:1256-1264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems
Wright et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:232-242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Explaining physicians' use of EMR systems and performance in the shakedown phase
Sykes et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:125-130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review of Health Information Exchange in Primary Care Practices
Fontaine et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:655-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey
Wright et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:66-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Relationship between Electronic Health Record Use and Quality of Care over Time
Zhou et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:457-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Use of Key Functions in Electronic Health Records from 2005 to 2007: A Statewide Survey
Simon et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:465-470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Development of a Highly Constrained Health Level 7 Implementation Guide to Facilitate Electronic Laboratory Reporting to Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Systems
Sujansky et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:285-290.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Health Records and Malpractice Claims in Office Practice
Virapongse et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2362-2367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.