You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 167 No. 6, March 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Physical Examination
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Screening
 •Mammography
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Delivery of Cancer Screening

How Important Is the Preventive Health Examination?

Joshua J. Fenton, MD, MPH; Yong Cai, PhD; Noel S. Weiss, MD, DrPH; Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPH; Roy E. Pardee, JD, MA; Robert J. Reid, MD, PhD; Laura-Mae Baldwin, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(6):580-585.

Background  Patients and physicians strongly endorse the importance of preventive or periodic health examinations (PHEs). However, the extent to which PHEs contribute to the delivery of cancer screening is uncertain.

Methods  In a retrospective cohort study, we determined the association between receipt of a PHE and cancer testing in a population-based sample of enrollees in a Washington State health plan who were aged 52 to 78 years and eligible for colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer screening in 2002-2003 (N = 64 288). Outcomes included completion of any colorectal cancer testing (fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or barium enema), screening mammography, and prostate-specific antigen testing.

Results  More than half (52.4%) of the enrollees received a PHE during the study period. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidity, number of outpatient visits, and historical preventive service use before January 1, 2002, receipt of a PHE was significantly associated with completion of colorectal cancer testing (incidence difference, 40.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 39.4%-41.3%]; relative incidence, 3.47 [95% CI, 3.34-3.59]), screening mammography [incidence difference, 14.2% [95% CI, 12.7%-15.7%]; relative incidence, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25]), and prostate-specific antigen testing (incidence difference, 39.4% [95% CI, 38.3%-40.5%]; relative incidence, 3.06 [95% CI, 2.95-3.18]).

Conclusions  Among managed care enrollees eligible for cancer screening, PHE receipt is associated with completion of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer testing. In similar populations, the PHE may serve as a clinically important forum for the promotion of evidence-based colorectal cancer and breast cancer screening and of screening with relatively less empirical support, such as prostate cancer screening.


Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento (Dr Fenton); Departments of Family Medicine (Drs Cai and Baldwin), Epidemiology (Drs Weiss and Elmore), and Medicine (Dr Elmore), University of Washington, Seattle; and Center for Health Studies (Mr Pardee and Dr Reid) and Department of Preventive Medicine (Dr Reid), Group Health Cooperative, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Longitudinal Adherence With Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening in Community Practice
Fenton et al.
Ann Fam Med 2010;8:397-401.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care, Economic Barriers to Health Care, and Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Among Medicare Enrollees Over Time
Doubeni et al.
Ann Fam Med 2010;8:299-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Holden et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2010;152:668-676.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intraclass Correlation Estimates for Cancer Screening Outcomes: Estimates and Applications in the Design of Group-Randomized Cancer Screening Studies
Hade et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:97-103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Response: Re: Interventions to Improving Osteoporosis Screening: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study
Levy et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:132-133.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Veterans
Walter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;150:465-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Primary Care Use on Population Delivery of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Fenton et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:640-645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventive Health Examinations and Preventive Gynecological Examinations in the United States
Mehrotra et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1876-1883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.