You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 14, July 28, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Positron Emission Tomography and Improved Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer

The Will Rogers Phenomenon Revisited

Karen G. Chee, MD; Danh V. Nguyen, PhD; Monica Brown, PhD; David R. Gandara, MD; Ted Wun, MD; Primo N. Lara Jr, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(14):1541-1549.

Background  The Will Rogers phenomenon occurs when newer technology allows for more sensitive detection of tumor spread, resulting in stage migration and an apparent improvement in patient survival. We investigated whether use of highly sensitive positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in non–small cell lung cancer has had this effect.

Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis involving 12 395 patients with non–small cell lung cancer in the pre-PET (1994-1998) and PET (1999-2004) periods. Interperiod differences in staging procedures, clinical variables, and patient survival were evaluated.

Results  There was a 5.4% decline in the number of patients with stage III disease and an 8.4% increase in the number of patients with stage IV disease in the PET period, corresponding with an increase in PET use from 6.3% to 20.1% (P < .001). The PET period predicted better survival with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99) (P = .02). Use of PET was independently associated with better survival in patients with stage III (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85) and stage IV (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70) disease, but not those with stage I or II disease.

Conclusion  These data support the notion that stage migration is responsible at least in part for an apparent improvement in survival for patients with stage III and IV non–small cell lung cancer in the PET scan era.


Author Affiliations: UC Davis Cancer Center (Drs Chee, Gandara, Wun, and Lara) and UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science Center (Drs Nguyen and Wun), UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, California; Veterans Administration Northern California Health Care System (Drs Gandara, Wun, and Lara), Sacramento; and the Cancer Surveillance Program, California Cancer Registry, Sacramento (Dr Brown); and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis (Dr Nguyen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.