 |
|
Medical Records and Quality of Care in Acute Coronary SyndromesResults From CRUSADE
Shannon M. Dunlay, MD;
Karen P. Alexander, MD;
Chiara Melloni, MD;
Jennifer L. Kraschnewski, MD;
Li Liang, PhD;
W. Brian Gibler, MD;
Matthew T. Roe, MD, MHS;
E. Magnus Ohman, MD;
Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1692-1698.
Background Patient medical records are important means of communication among health care providers. Limited evaluation has been performed of the quality of the medical records or its association with health care processes or outcomes.
Methods We performed an empirical evaluation of the completeness of medical records from 607 randomly selected patients admitted with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) to 219 US hospitals in the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative. Composite medical records scores were summated and compared by hospital academic status and physician specialty. Correlations between medical records scores, use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), and in-hospital mortality were assessed.
Results Medical records were frequently missing key elements, including cardiac history (23.6%), performance status (64.6%), differential diagnosis (57.8%), and planned use of EBM (44.0%). Evidence-based medicine was more often discussed in medical records from academic medical centers vs nonacademic medical centers (69.7% vs 51.7%) (P < .001) and from cardiologists vs noncardiologists (60.5% vs 48.1%, P = .003). Higher medical records quality scores were associated with greater use of EBM among the medical records quality cohort (P = .006), and a similar trend was observed in CRUSADE overall: adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.72) for high vs low medical records quality. Higher medical records quality scores were associated with lower in-hospital mortality: adjusted odds ratio, 0.79 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.97).
Conclusions Medical records for patients with NSTE ACS often lack key elements of the history and physical examination. Patients treated at hospitals with better medical records quality have significantly lower mortality and may receive more EBM. The relationship between better medical charting and better medical care could lead to new ways to monitor and improve the quality of medical care.
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine (Drs Dunlay and Kraschnewski), Division of Cardiology (Drs Alexander, Roe, Ohman, and Peterson), Duke University Medical Center, and Duke Clinical Research Institute (Drs Alexander, Melloni, Liang, Roe, Ohman, and Peterson), Durham, North Carolina; and Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Gibler).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Impact of missing data on standardised mortality ratios for acute myocardial infarction: evidence from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) 2004-7
Gale et al.
Heart 2011;97:1926-1931.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The American Heart Association's Recommendations for Expanding the Applications of Existing and Future Clinical Registries: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association
Bufalino et al.
Circulation 2011;123:2167-2179.
FULL TEXT
Delay From Symptom Onset to Hospital Presentation for Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Ting et al.
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1834-1841.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
