You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 16, September 8, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An Organized Approach to Improvement in Guideline Adherence for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Results With the Get With The Guidelines Quality Improvement Program

William R. Lewis, MD; Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH; Christopher P. Cannon, MD; Dennis M. Super, MD; Kenneth A. LaBresh, MD; Kathleen Quealy, MD; Li Liang, PhD; Gregg C. Fonarow, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1813-1819.

Background  Evidence-based guidelines from the American Heart Association are voluntary, and adherence is highly variable across the country. Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) is a national quality improvement program sponsored and developed by the American Heart Association. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether participation in GWTG is associated with greater adherence to guidelines for coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods  Data on adherence to guidelines were obtained from Hospital Compare, grouping hospitals according to participation in the GWTG-CAD program on January 1, 2004: GWTG-CAD hospitals, n = 223; non–GWTG-CAD hospitals, n = 3407. The GWTG program uses a patient management tool, education, and benchmarked quality reports to improve guideline adherence. Adherence to 8 national measures, including the use of aspirin and β-blockers early and at discharge and timeline reperfusion, was analyzed. A composite score was also calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for comparing composite adherence rates between groups.

Results  Adherence to the overall Hospital Compare composite measure was higher in GWTG-CAD hospitals than in non–GWTG-CAD hospitals (mean [SD], 89.7% [10.0%] vs 85.0 [15.0%]; absolute increase, 4.7%; P < .001). Adherence to the GWTG-CAD performance measures (PM) composite was also higher (89.5% [11.0%] vs 83.0% [18.0%]; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, GWTG-CAD participation was associated with a modest absolute increase in adherence to the PM composite by 2.52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19%-4.85%). Larger acute myocardial infarction volume by quartile (absolute increase, 14.2%; 95% CI, 12.2%-16.3%), geographic location in the Northeast, and teaching hospital status (absolute increase, 2.87%; 95% CI, 0.43-5.32) were also associated with improved adherence to the PM composite. As a control, evaluation of unrelated quality measures for pneumonia, showed lower adherence among GWTG-CAD participating hospitals (74.8% [7.3%] vs 76.1% [9.7%]; P = .005).

Conclusion  Participation in GWTG-CAD was independently associated with improvements in guideline adherence beyond that associated with public reporting.


Author Affiliations: Heart and Vascular Center, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs Lewis, Super, and Quealy); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina (Drs Peterson and Liang); Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Cannon); Masspro, Waltham, Massachusetts (Dr LaBresh); and Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Fonarow).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Call to ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network): A National Effort to Promote Timely Clinical Feedback and Support Continuous Quality Improvement for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Peterson et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:491-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk factor management after acute coronary syndromes
Melloni and Newby
Heart 2009;95:1382-1384.
FULL TEXT  

Reduction in Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the United States: Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates From 1995-2006
Krumholz et al.
JAMA 2009;302:767-773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In a Heartbeat: Decreasing In-Hospital Time to Defibrillation
Ho and Bradley
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1260-1261.
FULL TEXT  

Medication Underuse During Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Hoeks et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:338-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.