You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 21, November 24, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (66)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Screening
 •Mammography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Natural History of Invasive Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Mammography

Per-Henrik Zahl, MD, PhD; Jan Mæhlen, MD, PhD; H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2311-2316.

Background  The introduction of screening mammography has been associated with sustained increases in breast cancer incidence. The natural history of these screen-detected cancers is not well understood.

Methods  We compared cumulative breast cancer incidence in age-matched cohorts of women residing in 4 Norwegian counties before and after the initiation of biennial mammography. The screened group included all women who were invited for all 3 rounds of screening during the period 1996 through 2001 (age range in 1996, 50-64 years). The control group included all women who would have been invited for screening had there been a screening program during the period 1992 through 1997 (age range in 1992, 50-64 years). All women in the control group were invited to undergo a 1-time prevalence screen at the end of their observation period. Screening attendance was similar in both groups (screened, 78.3%, and controls, 79.5%). Counts of incident invasive breast cancers were obtained from the Norwegian Cancer Registry (in situ cancers were excluded).

Results  As expected, before the age-matched controls were invited to be screened at the end of their observation period, the cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer was significantly higher in the screened group than in the controls (4-year cumulative incidence: 1268 vs 810 per 100 000 population; relative rate, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-1.70). Even after prevalence screening in controls, however, the cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer remained 22% higher in the screened group (6-year cumulative incidence: 1909 vs 1564 per 100 000 population; relative rate, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.30). Higher incidence was observed in screened women at each year of age.

Conclusions  Because the cumulative incidence among controls never reached that of the screened group, it appears that some breast cancers detected by repeated mammographic screening would not persist to be detectable by a single mammogram at the end of 6 years. This raises the possibility that the natural course of some screen-detected invasive breast cancers is to spontaneously regress.


Author Affiliations: Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway (Dr Zahl); Department of Pathology, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo (Dr Mæhlen); and the VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire (Dr Welch).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis With Screening Mammography—Reply
Per-Henrik Zahl, Jan Mæhlen, and H. Gilbert Welch
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):1000-1001.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spontaneous Regression of Breast Cancer
Catherine Richards
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):996.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hormone Therapy Use May Explain Recent Results Regarding Tumor Regression
Harald Weedon-Fekjær, Ragnhild Sørum, and Marianne Kolstad Brenn
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):996-997.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spontaneous Regression of Invasive Breast Cancer: Does This Study Answer the Question?
Mette Kalager and Michael Bretthauer
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):997.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mammographic Screening and Breast Cancer: Florentine Data
Eugenio Paci, Donella Puliti, and Marco Zappa
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):997-998.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Possible Role of Mammography in Increased Incidence of Breast Cancer Not Considered
Marie H. Hanigan
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):998-999.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unaccounted Breast Cancers Do Not Infer Regression of Tumors
David Z. J. Chu
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):999.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis With Screening Mammography
Ismail Jatoi and William F. Anderson
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(10):999-1000.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2300.
FULL TEXT  

The Natural History of Breast Cancer
Robert M. Kaplan and Franz Porzsolt
Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2302-2303.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT
Saghir et al.
Thorax 2012;0:thoraxjnl-2011-200736v1-thoraxjnl-2011-200736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Overdiagnosis from non-progressive cancer detected by screening mammography: stochastic simulation study with calibration to population based registry data
Seigneurin et al.
BMJ 2011;343:d7017-d7017.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Breast Screening Programme and misinforming the public
Gotzsche and Jorgensen
JRSM 2011;104:361-369.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mammographic Screening and "Overdiagnosis"
Kopans et al.
Radiology 2011;260:616-620.
FULL TEXT  

Is Mammographic Screening Justifiable Considering Its Substantial Overdiagnosis Rate and Minor Effect on Mortality?
Jorgensen et al.
Radiology 2011;260:621-627.
FULL TEXT  

Personalizing Mammography by Breast Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: Analysis of Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness
Schousboe et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2011;155:10-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Independent Prognostic Value of Screen Detection in Invasive Breast Cancer
Mook et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:585-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Cancer Screening: Focusing on Colorectal Cancer Recommendations
Cantor
Integr Cancer Ther 2010;9:322-325.
 

Quality-of-Life Issues in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Ganz
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:218-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database
Autier et al.
BMJ 2010;341:c3620-c3620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Global Patterns of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends
Jemal et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893-1907.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Breast and Prostate Cancers: Moving Toward Transparency
Newman
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1008-1011.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Santen et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;95:s1-s66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening
Junod and Spinosa
J Med Screen 2010;17:103-103.
FULL TEXT  

Duffy and colleagues reply
Duffy et al.
J Med Screen 2010;17:103-103.
FULL TEXT  

Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer
Esserman et al.
JAMA 2009;302:1685-1692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Overdiagnosis and mammography screening
Welch
BMJ 2009;339:b1425-b1425.
FULL TEXT  

Spontaneous Regression of Breast Cancer
Richards
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:996-996.
FULL TEXT  

Spontaneous Regression of Invasive Breast Cancer: Does This Study Answer the Question?
Kalager and Bretthauer
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:997-997.
FULL TEXT  

Possible Role of Mammography in Increased Incidence of Breast Cancer Not Considered
Hanigan
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:998-999.
FULL TEXT  

Unaccounted Breast Cancers Do Not Infer Regression of Tumors
Chu
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:999-999.
FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis With Screening Mammography--Reply
Zahl et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1000-1001.
FULL TEXT  

Hormone Therapy Use May Explain Recent Results Regarding Tumor Regression
Weedon-Fekjaer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:996-997.
FULL TEXT  

Mammographic Screening and Breast Cancer: Florentine Data
Paci et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:997-998.
FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis With Screening Mammography
Jatoi and Anderson
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:999-1000.
FULL TEXT  

Do Some Breast Cancers Disappear?
JWatch Women's Health 2008;2008:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2008;337:a2802-a2802.
FULL TEXT  

The Natural History of Breast Cancer
Kaplan and Porzsolt
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:2302-2303.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.