You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 168 No. 21, November 24, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prognostic Influence of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressures in Resistant Hypertension

Gil F. Salles, MD, PhD; Claudia R. L. Cardoso, MD, PhD; Elizabeth S. Muxfeldt, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(21):2340-2346.

Background  The prognostic value of office and ambulatory blood pressures (BPs) in patients with resistant hypertension is uncertain.

Methods  This prospective study investigates the importance of office and ambulatory BPs as predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. At baseline, 556 resistant hypertensive patients underwent clinical-laboratory and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring examinations. Primary end points were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities. Multiple Cox regression was used to assess associations between BP and subsequent end points.

Results  After median follow-up of 4.8 years, 109 patients (19.6%) reached the primary end point, and 70 all-cause deaths (12.6%) occurred (46 had cardiovascular causes). After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, previous cardiovascular diseases, serum creatinine level, and number of antihypertensive drugs in use, no office BP showed any prognostic value. After further adjustment for office BP, higher mean ambulatory BPs were independent predictors of the composite end point. The hazard ratios associated with a 1-SD increment in daytime and nighttime systolic BP were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.53) and 1.38 (1.13-1.68), respectively; the corresponding values for diastolic BP were 1.31 (1.05-1.63) and 1.36 (1.10-1.69). Ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP were equivalent predictors, and both were better than pulse pressure; nighttime BP was superior to daytime BP. For all-cause mortality, only the ambulatory BP monitoring diagnosis of true resistant hypertension was an independent predictor.

Conclusion  Higher ambulatory BP predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in resistant hypertensive patients, whereas office BP has no prognostic value.


Author Affiliations: University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Medical School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Secondary Causes of Resistant Hypertension
Weekitt Kittisupamongkol
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(7):717.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Resistant hypertension
Fagard
Heart 2012;98:254-261.
FULL TEXT  

Appropriate Time Interval to Repeat Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With White-Coat Resistant Hypertension
Muxfeldt et al.
Hypertension 2012;59:384-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Description of Antihypertensive Use in Patients With Resistant Hypertension Prescribed Four or More Agents
Hanselin et al.
Hypertension 2011;58:1008-1013.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resistant Hypertension: Bad and Getting Worse
Ahmed and Calhoun
Hypertension 2011;57:1045-1046.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Features of 8295 Patients With Resistant Hypertension Classified on the Basis of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
de la Sierra et al.
Hypertension 2011;57:898-902.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Urinary Albumin Excretion Is Associated With Nocturnal Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistant Hypertensives
Oliveras et al.
Hypertension 2011;57:556-560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sleep and Hypertension
Calhoun and Harding
Chest 2010;138:434-443.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Spironolactone Therapy in Patients With True Resistant Hypertension
de Souza et al.
Hypertension 2010;55:147-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is systolic blood pressure all that matters? No
O'Brien
BMJ 2009;339:b2669-b2669.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction in Resistant Hypertension
Muxfeldt et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:874-880.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Secondary Causes of Resistant Hypertension
Kittisupamongkol
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:717-717.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.