• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (24)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular System, Other  • Psychosocial Issues  • Cardiovascular System  • Diagnosis  • Hypertension  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Role of Patient Anxiety

Gbenga Ogedegbe, MD; Thomas G. Pickering, MD; Lynn Clemow, PhD; William Chaplin, PhD; Tanya M. Spruill, PhD; Gabrielle M. Albanese, BS; Kazuo Eguchi, MD; Matthew Burg, PhD; William Gerin, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(22):2459-2465.

Background  The white coat effect (defined as the difference between blood pressure [BP] measurements taken at the physician's office and those taken outside the office) is an important determinant of misdiagnosis of hypertension, but little is known about the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. We tested the hypothesis that the white coat effect may be a conditioned response as opposed to a manifestation of general anxiety.

Methods  A total of 238 patients in a hypertension clinic wore ambulatory blood pressure monitors on 3 separate days 1 month apart. At each clinic visit, BP readings were manually triggered in the waiting area and the examination room (in the presence and absence of the physician) and were compared with the mercury sphygmomanometer readings taken by the physician in the examination room. Patients completed trait and state anxiety measures before and after each BP assessment.

Results  A total of 35% of the sample was normotensive, and 9%, 37%, and 19% had white coat, sustained, and masked hypertension, respectively. The diagnostic category was associated with the state anxiety measure (F_3,237 = 6.4, P < .001) but not with the trait anxiety measure. Patients with white coat hypertension had significantly higher state anxiety scores (t = 2.67, P < .01), with the greatest difference reported during the physician measurement. The same pattern was observed for BP changes, which generally paralleled the changes in state anxiety (t = 4.86, P < .002 for systolic BP; t = 3.51, P < .002 for diastolic BP).

Conclusions  These findings support our hypothesis that the white coat effect is a conditioned response. The BP measurements taken by physicians appear to exacerbate the white coat effect more than other means. This problem could be addressed with uniform use of automated BP devices in office settings.

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Columbia University/New York Presbyterian Hospital (Drs Ogedegbe, Pickering, Clemow, Spruill, Eguchi, Burg, and Gerin and Ms Albanese) and Department of Psychology, St Johns University (Dr Chaplin), New York, New York. Dr Ogedegbe is now with the Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York. Dr Gerin is now with the Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review
Hodgkinson et al.
BMJ 2011;342:d3621-d3621.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Novel Approach to Office Blood Pressure Measurement: 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure vs Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure
van der Wel et al.
Ann Fam Med 2011;9:128-135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Taking blood pressure: Too important to trust to humans?
VIDT et al.
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2010;77:683-688.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT