• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular Interventions, Other  • Cardiovascular System  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Reasons Why Physicians Choose Not to Refer Their Patients

Cindy H. Lee, MD; Mary Tan, BSc; Andrew T. Yan, MD; Raymond T. Yan, MD; David Fitchett, MD; Etienne A. Grima, MSc; Anatoly Langer, MD, MSc; Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc; for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) Registry II Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(3):291-296.

Background  Despite the recommendation for an early invasive strategy in the treatment of patients who present with non–ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS), referral for cardiac catheterization is suboptimal; the reasons why some patients are not referred remain unclear.

Methods  Patients were recruited into the prospective, observational Canadian ACS Registry II between October 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003; 2136 patients with NSTE ACS identified through the registry were divided into tertiles according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score and the rates of catheterization compared. In addition, the most responsible physicians were asked to indicate the main reason they did not refer their patients for catheterization.

Results  The rate of referral for catheterization was 64.7%. Patients who underwent catheterization had lower in-hospital (0.8% vs 3.7%; P < .001) and 1-year mortality rates (4.0% vs 10.9%; P < .001) compared with those who did not. Higher-risk patients were referred at a similar rate as low-risk patients (62.5% vs 66.9%; P = .25). Among the reasons provided by the most responsible physician as to why patients were not referred for catheterization, 68.4% of patients were thought to be "not at high enough risk"; however, 59.1% of these patients were found to be at intermediate to high risk according to their baseline Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score.

Conclusions  Cardiac catheterization is not used optimally in patients who present with NSTE ACS. Despite better in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in those patients who are referred for catheterization, many higher-risk patients are not being referred because of the perception that they are not at high enough risk. A significant opportunity remains to improve on accurate risk stratification and adherence to an early invasive strategy for higher-risk patients.

Author Affiliations: The Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto (Drs Lee, A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, Fitchett, and Goodman), and the Canadian Heart Research Centre (Ms Tan, Mr Grima, and Drs A. T. Yan, Fitchett, Langer, and Goodman), Toronto, Ontario.
Group Information: A list of participating Canadian ACS Registry II Investigators and Coordinators was published in Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1009-1016.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Vitamin D Level, Respiratory Tract Infections, and Controlled Trials—Reply
Adit A. Ginde, Jonathan M. Mansbach, and Carlos A. Camargo, Jr
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(15):1443-1444.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adjustment of the GRACE score by growth differentiation factor 15 enables a more accurate appreciation of risk in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Widera et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;0:ehr444v1-ehr444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors influencing underutilization of evidence-based therapies in women
Bugiardini et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;32:1337-1344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utilization and Determinants of In-Hospital Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome From the Middle East
Panduranga et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2010;61:744-750.
ABSTRACT  

Optimal Medical Therapy for Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Exploring Why Physicians Do Not Prescribe Evidence-Based Treatment and Why Patients Discontinue Medications After Discharge
Bagnall et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:530-537.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Risk Assessment
Scirica
J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1403-1415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's health and gender-based clinical trials on etoricoxib: methodological gender bias
Chilet-Rosell et al.
J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;31:434-445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Concentration on More Intensive Treatment for Younger Patients More Rational and Humane Than Ignorant?--Reply
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1442-1443.
FULL TEXT  

Temporal management patterns and outcomes of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in patients with kidney dysfunction
Wong et al.
Eur Heart J 2009;30:549-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding Physicians' Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Canadian ACS 2 Registry
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:372-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequency of Stress Testing to Document Ischemia Prior to Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Lin et al.
JAMA 2008;300:1765-1773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Year in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Giugliano and Braunwald
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1095-1103.
FULL TEXT  

Early Catheterization for Non-ST-Segment Elevation MI: How High Is the Bar?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2008;2008:1-1.
FULL TEXT