• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (20)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Aging/ Geriatrics  • Cardiovascular System, Other  • Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders  • Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other  • Cardiovascular System  • Pulmonary Diseases, Other  • Radiologic Imaging  • Computed Tomography  • Radiography  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Prevalence and Clinical Correlates

Jeremy R. Burt, MD; Carlos Iribarren, MD, MPH, PhD; Joan M. Fair, ANP, PhD; Linda C. Norton, RN, MSN; Mohammed Mahbouba, MD; Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD; Mark A. Hlatky, MD; Alan S. Go, MD; Stephen P. Fortmann, MD; for the Atherosclerotic Disease, Vascular Function, and Genetic Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study

Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):756-761.

Background  With the widespread use of cardiac multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), the issue of incidental findings is receiving increasing attention. Our objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings discovered during cardiac MDCT scanning and to identify clinical variables associated with incidental findings.

Methods  This cross-sectional analysis involved a population-based sample recruited from an integrated health care delivery system in Northern California as part of the Atherosclerotic Disease, Vascular Function and Genetic Epidemiology (ADVANCE) Study. Healthy men and women aged 60 to 69 years without diagnosed cardiovascular disease underwent cardiac MDCT for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification. The images were prospectively evaluated for incidental findings.

Results  A total of 459 participants underwent MDCT scanning, and the overall prevalence of any incidental finding was 41%. Of the 459 participants,105 (23%) had at least 1 incidental finding that was recommended for clinical or radiological follow-up examination, the most common of which was single or multiple pulmonary nodules (18%). Participants with and without incidental findings had comparable baseline demographics and selected clinical variables, although there were significantly fewer men and a significantly lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in those with incidental findings.

Conclusions  Incidental findings, especially pulmonary nodules, are common in cardiac MDCT performed to assess coronary artery calcification in older healthy adults. The net risks and benefits of looking for noncardiac abnormalities during cardiac MDCT should be rigorously evaluated.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Burt, Hlatky, and Fortmann), Radiology (Drs Burt and Rubin), and Health Research and Policy (Dr Hlatky), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland (Drs Iribarren and Go); Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford (Drs Fair, Mahbouba, and Fortmann and Ms Norton); and Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Go).

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Pros and Cons of Searching for Extracardiac Findings at Cardiac CT: Use of a Restricted Field of View Is Acceptable
White
Radiology 2011;261:338-341.
FULL TEXT  

Incidental Findings in Imaging Research: Evaluating Incidence, Benefit, and Burden
Orme et al.
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1525-1532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidental Extracardiac Findings at Coronary CT: Clinical and Economic Impact
Lee et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010;194:1531-1538.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lung Cancer Detected at Cardiac CT: Prevalence, Clinicoradiologic Features, and Importance of Full-Field-of-View Images
Kim et al.
Radiology 2010;255:369-376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Potential Clinical and Economic Consequences of Noncardiac Incidental Findings on Cardiac Computed Tomography
MacHaalany et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1533-1541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Dilemma of Incidental Findings on Cardiac Computed Tomography
Hlatky and Iribarren
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1542-1543.
FULL TEXT  

The Year in Cardiac Imaging
Gibbons et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:54-70.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluating cardiovascular risk assessment for asymptomatic people
Scott
BMJ 2009;338:a2844-a2844.
FULL TEXT  

The unbearable lightness of diagnostic testing: time to contain inappropriate test ordering
Schattner
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:618-621.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT