You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 12, June 22, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eAppendix
 •CME Course for This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Quality of Life
 •Osteoarthritis
 •Surgery
 •Orthopedic Surgery
 •Health Care Reform
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Cost-effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

Patient Risk and Hospital Volume

Elena Losina, PhD; Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH; Courtenay L. Kessler, MS; Parastu S. Emrani, BS; William M. Reichmann, MA; Elizabeth A. Wright, PhD; Holly L. Holt, BS; Daniel H. Solomon, MD, MPH; Edward Yelin, PhD; A. David Paltiel, PhD; Jeffrey N. Katz, MD, MS

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1113-1121.

Background  Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relieves pain and improves quality of life for persons with advanced knee osteoarthritis. However, to our knowledge, the cost-effectiveness of TKA and the influences of hospital volume and patient risk on TKA cost-effectiveness have not been investigated in the United States.

Methods  We developed a Markov, state-transition, computer simulation model and populated it with Medicare claims data and cost and outcomes data from national and multinational sources. We projected lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for different risk populations and varied TKA intervention and hospital volume. Cost-effectiveness of TKA was estimated across all patient risk and hospital volume permutations. Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to determine various parameters' influences on cost-effectiveness.

Results  Overall, TKA increased QALE from 6.822 to 7.957 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Lifetime costs rose from $37 100 (no TKA) to $57 900 after TKA, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18 300 per QALY. For high-risk patients, TKA increased QALE from 5.713 to 6.594 QALY, yielding a cost-effectiveness ratio of $28 100 per QALY. At all risk levels, TKA was more costly and less effective in low-volume centers than in high-volume centers. Results were insensitive to variations of key input parameters within policy-relevant, clinically plausible ranges. The greatest variations were seen for the quality of life gain after TKA and the cost of TKA.

Conclusions  Total knee arthroplasty appears to be cost-effective in the US Medicare-aged population, as currently practiced across all risk groups. Policy decisions should be made on the basis of available local options for TKA. However, when a high-volume hospital is available, TKAs performed in a high-volume hospital confer even greater value per dollar spent than TKAs performed in low-volume centers.


Author Affiliations: Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Drs Losina, Wright, and Katz, Mss Kessler, Emrani, and Holt, and Mr Reichmann), Division of Infectious Disease (Dr Walensky), Section of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy (Drs Losina, Wright, Solomon, and Katz), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (Dr Losina and Mr Reichmann); Divisions of Infectious Disease and General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Walensky); Rosalind Russell Medical Research Center for Arthritis, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Yelin); Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Dr Paltiel); and Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (Dr Katz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of an Established, Effective Procedure
Stephen Lyman, Robert G. Marx, and Peter B. Bach
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1102-1103.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States—Invited Commentary
Kevin Bozic
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1121-1122.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Older Than 30 Years in the United States
Kim et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:538-545.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;338:b2590-b2590.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of an Established, Effective Procedure
Lyman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1102-1103.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.