You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 12, June 22, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eSupplement
 •Survey
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Frequency of Failure to Inform Patients of Clinically Significant Outpatient Test Results

Lawrence P. Casalino, MD, PhD; Daniel Dunham, MD, MPH; Marshall H. Chin, MD, MPH; Rebecca Bielang, MD; Emily O. Kistner, PhD; Theodore G. Karrison, PhD; Michael K. Ong, MD, PhD; Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH; Margaret A. McLaughlin, MD; David O. Meltzer, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123-1129.

Background  Failing to inform a patient of an abnormal outpatient test result can be a serious error, but little is known about the frequency of such errors or the processes for managing results that may reduce errors.

Methods  We conducted a retrospective medical record review of 5434 randomly selected patients aged 50 to 69 years in 19 community-based and 4 academic medical center primary care practices. Primary care practice physicians were surveyed about their processes for managing test results, and individual physicians were notified of apparent failures to inform and asked whether they had informed the patient. Blinded reviewers calculated a "process score" ranging from 0 to 5 for each practice using survey responses.

Results  The rate of apparent failures to inform or to document informing the patient was 7.1% (135 failures divided by 1889 abnormal results), with a range of 0% to 26.2%. The mean process score was 3.8 (range, 0.9-5.0). In mixed-effects logistic regression, higher process scores were associated with lower failure rates (odds ratio, 0.68; P < .001). Use of a "partial electronic medical record" (paper-based progress notes and electronic test results or vice versa) was associated with higher failure rates compared with not having an electronic medical record (odds ratio, 1.92; P = .03) or with having an electronic medical record that included both progress notes and test results (odds ratio, 2.37; P = .007).

Conclusions  Failures to inform patients or to document informing patients of abnormal outpatient test results are common; use of simple processes for managing results is associated with lower failure rates.


Author Affiliations: Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (Dr Casalino); Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Dunham); Sections of General Internal Medicine (Dr Chin) and Hospital Medicine (Dr Meltzer) and Department of Health Studies (Drs Kistner and Karrison), University of Chicago, Chicago; Mt Sinai Medical Center, New York (Dr Bielang); Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Drs Ong and Sarkar); and Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago (Dr McLaughlin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Informatics Aids to Reduce Failure Rates in Notification of Abnormal Outpatient Test Results
Giuseppe Lippi and Mario Plebani
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Thomas Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815-1816.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer
Kate Christensen and Jan Oldenburg
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1816.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer—Reply
Lawrence P. Casalino, Daniel P. Dunham, Marshall H. Chin, Rebecca Bieland, Emily O. Kistner, Theodore G. Karrison, Michael K. Ong, Urimala Sarkar, Margaret A. McLaughlin, and David O. Meltzer
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1816-1817.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Thomas Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815-1816.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1094.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care
Singh et al.
BMJQS 2012;21:93-100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

System-related interventions to reduce diagnostic errors: a narrative review
Singh et al.
BMJQS 2012;21:160-170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine
Barth
Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:9-16.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Patients Get Direct Access to Their Laboratory Test Results?: An Answer With Many Questions
Davis Giardina and Singh
JAMA 2011;306:2502-2503.
FULL TEXT  

Accountability for Medical Error: Moving Beyond Blame to Advocacy
Bell et al.
Chest 2011;140:519-526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paid Malpractice Claims for Adverse Events in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings
Bishop et al.
JAMA 2011;305:2427-2431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Error: A 60-Year-Old Man With Delayed Care for a Renal Mass
Schiff
JAMA 2011;305:1890-1898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review
Callen et al.
BMJQS 2011;0:bmjqs.2010.044339v1-bmjqs.2010.044339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Taking action to avoid recurring risks in medical professional liability claims
Melonas and McNary
Neurology 2010;75:S45-S51.
FULL TEXT  

Characteristics and Predictors of Missed Opportunities in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: An Electronic Health Record-Based Study
Singh et al.
JCO 2010;28:3307-3315.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine
Plebani
Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:101-110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informatics Aids to Reduce Failure Rates in Notification of Abnormal Outpatient Test Results
Lippi and Plebani
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1815-1815.
FULL TEXT  

Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer
Christensen and Oldenburg
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1816-1816.
FULL TEXT  

EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1815-1816.
FULL TEXT  

Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer--Reply
Casalino et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1816-1817.
FULL TEXT  

Failure to Inform Patients About Abnormal Test Results
JWatch General 2009;2009:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;338:b2590-b2590.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.