 |
 |

Frequency of Failure to Inform Patients of Clinically Significant Outpatient Test Results
Lawrence P. Casalino, MD, PhD;
Daniel Dunham, MD, MPH;
Marshall H. Chin, MD, MPH;
Rebecca Bielang, MD;
Emily O. Kistner, PhD;
Theodore G. Karrison, PhD;
Michael K. Ong, MD, PhD;
Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH;
Margaret A. McLaughlin, MD;
David O. Meltzer, MD, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1123-1129.
Background Failing to inform a patient of an abnormal outpatient test result can be a serious error, but little is known about the frequency of such errors or the processes for managing results that may reduce errors.
Methods We conducted a retrospective medical record review of 5434 randomly selected patients aged 50 to 69 years in 19 community-based and 4 academic medical center primary care practices. Primary care practice physicians were surveyed about their processes for managing test results, and individual physicians were notified of apparent failures to inform and asked whether they had informed the patient. Blinded reviewers calculated a "process score" ranging from 0 to 5 for each practice using survey responses.
Results The rate of apparent failures to inform or to document informing the patient was 7.1% (135 failures divided by 1889 abnormal results), with a range of 0% to 26.2%. The mean process score was 3.8 (range, 0.9-5.0). In mixed-effects logistic regression, higher process scores were associated with lower failure rates (odds ratio, 0.68; P < .001). Use of a "partial electronic medical record" (paper-based progress notes and electronic test results or vice versa) was associated with higher failure rates compared with not having an electronic medical record (odds ratio, 1.92; P = .03) or with having an electronic medical record that included both progress notes and test results (odds ratio, 2.37; P = .007).
Conclusions Failures to inform patients or to document informing patients of abnormal outpatient test results are common; use of simple processes for managing results is associated with lower failure rates.
Author Affiliations: Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York (Dr Casalino); Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Dunham); Sections of General Internal Medicine (Dr Chin) and Hospital Medicine (Dr Meltzer) and Department of Health Studies (Drs Kistner and Karrison), University of Chicago, Chicago; Mt Sinai Medical Center, New York (Dr Bielang); Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Drs Ong and Sarkar); and Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago (Dr McLaughlin).
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Informatics Aids to Reduce Failure Rates in Notification of Abnormal Outpatient Test Results
Giuseppe Lippi and Mario Plebani
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Thomas Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815-1816.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer
Kate Christensen and Jan Oldenburg
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1816.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer—Reply
Lawrence P. Casalino, Daniel P. Dunham, Marshall H. Chin, Rebecca Bieland, Emily O. Kistner, Theodore G. Karrison, Michael K. Ong, Urimala Sarkar, Margaret A. McLaughlin, and David O. Meltzer
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1816-1817.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Thomas Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1815-1816.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(12):1094.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care
Singh et al.
BMJQS 2012;21:93-100.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
System-related interventions to reduce diagnostic errors: a narrative review
Singh et al.
BMJQS 2012;21:160-170.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine
Barth
Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:9-16.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Should Patients Get Direct Access to Their Laboratory Test Results?: An Answer With Many Questions
Davis Giardina and Singh
JAMA 2011;306:2502-2503.
FULL TEXT
Accountability for Medical Error: Moving Beyond Blame to Advocacy
Bell et al.
Chest 2011;140:519-526.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Paid Malpractice Claims for Adverse Events in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings
Bishop et al.
JAMA 2011;305:2427-2431.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medical Error: A 60-Year-Old Man With Delayed Care for a Renal Mass
Schiff
JAMA 2011;305:1890-1898.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review
Callen et al.
BMJQS 2011;0:bmjqs.2010.044339v1-bmjqs.2010.044339.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Taking action to avoid recurring risks in medical professional liability claims
Melonas and McNary
Neurology 2010;75:S45-S51.
FULL TEXT
Characteristics and Predictors of Missed Opportunities in Lung Cancer Diagnosis: An Electronic Health Record-Based Study
Singh et al.
JCO 2010;28:3307-3315.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine
Plebani
Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:101-110.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Informatics Aids to Reduce Failure Rates in Notification of Abnormal Outpatient Test Results
Lippi and Plebani
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1815-1815.
FULL TEXT
Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer
Christensen and Oldenburg
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1816-1816.
FULL TEXT
EMRs Do Not Improve Reporting Rates of Abnormal Laboratory Results?
Zimmerman
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1815-1816.
FULL TEXT
Giving Patients Their Results Online Might Be the Answer--Reply
Casalino et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1816-1817.
FULL TEXT
Failure to Inform Patients About Abnormal Test Results
JWatch General 2009;2009:2-2.
FULL TEXT
All you need to read in the other general journals
BMJ 2009;338:b2590-b2590.
FULL TEXT
|