You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 17, September 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eSupplement
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Diagnosis
 •Health Care Reform
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
A Model of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Outcomes for Low- to High-Risk Men

Information to Support Informed Choices

Kirsten Howard, BSc(Hons), MAppSc, MPH, MHealthEcon, PhD; Alex Barratt, MBBS, MPH, PhD; Graham J. Mann, MBBS, PhD; Manish I. Patel, MBBS, MMed, FRACS, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1603-1610.

Background  Information is needed to aid individual decision making about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening.

Methods  We aimed to provide such information for men aged 40, 50, 60, and 70 years at low, moderate, and high risk for prostate cancer. A Markov model compared patients with vs without annual PSA screening using a 20% relative risk (RR) reduction (RR = 0.8) in prostate cancer mortality as a best-case scenario. The model estimated numbers of biopsies, prostate cancers, and deaths from prostate cancer per 1000 men over 10 years and cumulated to age 85 years.

Results  Benefits and harms vary substantially with age and familial risk. Using 60-year-old men with low risk as an example, of 1000 men screened annually, we estimate that 115 men will undergo biopsy triggered by an abnormal PSA screen result and that 53 men will be diagnosed as having prostate cancer over 10 years compared with 23 men diagnosed as having prostate cancer among 1000 unscreened men. Among screened men, 3.5 will die of prostate cancer over 10 years compared with 4.4 deaths in unscreened men. For 1000 men screened from 40 to 69 years of age, there will be 27.9 prostate cancer deaths and 639.5 deaths overall by age 85 years compared with 29.9 prostate cancer deaths and 640.4 deaths overall in unscreened men. Higher-risk men have more prostate cancer deaths averted but also more prostate cancers diagnosed and related harms.

Conclusions  Men should be informed of the likely benefits and harms of PSA screening. These estimates can be used to support individual decision making.


Author Affiliations: Screening and Test Evaluation Program (Dr Howard) and Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence Based Medicine (Dr Barratt), School of Public Health, and Urological Cancer Surgery (Dr Patel), University of Sydney, Sydney, and Western Clinical School, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead (Dr Mann), Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1550.
FULL TEXT  

Weighing the Benefits and Downsides of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
Michael Pignone
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1554-1556.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Results From the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS Study)
Richard M. Hoffman, Mick P. Couper, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Carrie A. Levin, Mary McNaughton-Collins, Deborah L. Helitzer, John VanHoewyk, and Michael J. Barry
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1611-1618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The COMPASs Study: Community Preferences for Prostate cAncer Screening. Protocol for a quantitative preference study
Howard et al.
BMJ Open 2012;2:e000587-e000587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating to citizens the benefits, harms and risks of preventive interventions
Thornton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2010;64:101-102.
FULL TEXT  

Weighing the Benefits and Downsides of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
Pignone
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1554-1556.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.