You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 17, September 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Clinical Observation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Health Care Reform
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Medication Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Clinicians' Assessments of Electronic Medication Safety Alerts in Ambulatory Care

Saul N. Weingart, MD, PhD; Brett Simchowitz, BA; Lawrence Shiman, MPP; Daniela Brouillard, BA; Adrienne Cyrulik, MPH; Roger B. Davis, ScD; Thomas Isaac, MD, MPH, MBA; Michael Massagli, PhD; Laurinda Morway, MEd; Daniel Z. Sands, MD, MPH; Justin Spencer, MPA; Joel S. Weissman, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1627-1632.

Background  While electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) systems with drug interaction and allergy alerts promise to improve medication safety in ambulatory care, clinicians often override these safety features. We undertook a study of respondents' satisfaction with e-prescribing systems, their perceptions of alerts, and their perceptions of behavior changes resulting from alerts.

Methods  Random sample survey of 300 Massachusetts ambulatory care clinicians who used a commercial e-prescribing system.

Results  A total of 184 respondents completed the survey (61%). Respondents indicated that e-prescribing improved the quality of care delivered (78%), prevented medical errors (83%), and enhanced patient satisfaction (71%) and clinician efficiency (75%). In addition, 35% of prescribers said that electronic alerts caused them to modify a potentially dangerous prescription in the last 30 days. They suggested that alerts also led to other changes in clinical care: counseling patients about potential reactions (49% of respondents), looking up information in medical references (44%), and changing the way a patient was monitored (33%). Altogether, 63% of clinicians reported taking action other than discontinuing or modifying an alerted prescription in the previous month in response to alerts. Despite these benefits, fewer than half of respondents were satisfied with drug interaction and allergy alerts (47%). Problems included alerts triggered by discontinued medications (58%), alerts that failed to account for appropriate drug combinations (46%), and excessive volume of alerts (37%).

Conclusion  Although clinicians were critical of the quality of e-prescribing alerts, alerts may lead to clinically significant modifications in patient management not readily apparent based on "acceptance" rates.


Author Affiliations: Center for Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Weingart and Isaac, Messrs Simchowitz, Shiman, and Spencer, and Mss Brouillard and Morway); Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Weingart, Davis, Isaac, Sands, and Weissman); Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Boston (Ms Cyrulik); Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston (Drs Davis, Isaac, and Sands); PatientsLikeMe, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Massagli); Cisco, San Jose, California (Dr Sands); Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Weissman); Executive Office of Health and Human Services, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Boston (Dr Weissman); and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Weissman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Development and validation of a survey instrument for assessing prescribers' perception of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts
Zheng et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i51-i61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians
Richardson and Ash
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i28-i35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alternatives to potentially inappropriate medications for use in e-prescribing software: triggers and treatment algorithms
Hume et al.
BMJQS 2011;20:875-884.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical issues associated with drug-drug interactions: Highlights of a multistakeholder conference
Hines et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68:941-946.
FULL TEXT  

Differences Between Integrated And Stand-Alone E-Prescribing Systems Have Implications For Future Use
DesRoches et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:2268-2277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID-warfarin co-prescribing as a test case
Strom et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:411-415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.