 |
 |

Sex Differences in Mortality After Acute Myocardial InfarctionChanges From 1994 to 2006
Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD;
Lori Parsons, BS;
Eric D. Peterson, MD;
William J. Rogers, MD;
Catarina I. Kiefe, MD, PhD;
John Canto, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1767-1774.
Background Previous studies have shown that women younger than 55 years have higher hospital mortality rates after acute myocardial infarction (MI) than age-matched men. We examined whether such mortality differences have decreased in recent years.
Methods We investigated temporal trends in the hospital case-fatality rates of MI by sex and age from June 1, 1994, through December 31, 2006. The study population included 916 380 patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction with a confirmed diagnosis of MI.
Results In-hospital mortality decreased markedly between 1994 and 2006 in all patients but more so in women than men. The mortality reduction in 2006 relative to 1994 was largest in women younger than 55 years (52.9%) and lowest in men younger than 55 years (33.3%). In patients younger than 55 years, the absolute decrease in mortality was 3 times larger in women than men (2.7% vs 0.9%). As a result, the excess mortality in younger women (<55 years) compared with men was less pronounced in 2004-2006 (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.67) than it was in 1994-1995 (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.24). The sex difference in mortality decrease was lower in older patients (P = .004 for the interaction among sex, age, and year). Changes in comorbidity and clinical severity features at admission accounted for more than 90% of these mortality trends.
Conclusions In recent years, women, particularly younger ones, experienced larger improvements in hospital mortality after MI than men. The narrowing of the mortality gap between younger women and men is largely attributable to temporal changes in risk profiles.
Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory School of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Vaccarino); ICON Clinical Research, Lifecycle Sciences Group, San Francisco, California (Ms Parsons); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Peterson); Divisions of Cardiovascular Disease (Dr Rogers) and Preventive Medicine (Dr Kiefe), University of Alabama at Birmingham; and Watson Clinic, Lakeland, Florida (Dr Canto).
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1736.
FULL TEXT
Women's Cardiovascular Health: Prevention Is Key
Sabine Oertelt-Prigione and Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1740-1741.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sex-Specific Trends in Midlife Coronary Heart Disease Risk and Prevalence
Amytis Towfighi, Ling Zheng, and Bruce Ovbiagele
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(19):1762-1766.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Sex/Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: What a Difference a Decade Makes
Mosca et al.
Circulation 2011;124:2145-2154.
FULL TEXT
Sex differences in hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction in China: findings from a study of 45 852 patients in the COMMIT/CCS-2 study
Chen et al.
Heart Asia 2011;3:104-110.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Factors influencing underutilization of evidence-based therapies in women
Bugiardini et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;32:1337-1344.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Ischaemic heart disease in women: are there sex differences in pathophysiology and risk factors?: Position Paper from the Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation of the European Society of Cardiology
Vaccarino et al.
Cardiovasc Res 2011;90:9-17.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Missed Opportunities in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention?: Low Rates of Hypertension Recognition for Women at Medicine and Obstetrics-Gynecology Clinics
Schmittdiel et al.
Hypertension 2011;57:717-722.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) Study Design
Lichtman et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:684-693.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Psychosocial Factors in the Development of Heart Disease in Women: Current Research and Future Directions
Low et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2010;72:842-854.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A General Propensity to Psychological Distress Affects Cardiovascular Outcomes: Evidence From Research on the Type D (Distressed) Personality Profile
Denollet et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:546-557.
FULL TEXT
Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Many Questions, Few Facts
Vaccarino
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:111-115.
FULL TEXT
Cardiovascular Disease Trends
JWatch General 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT
In-Hospital Mortality After MI: Vive la Difference?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2009;2009:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Women and Heart Disease: More Work to Be Done
JWatch Women's Health 2009;2009:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Women's Cardiovascular Health: Prevention Is Key
Oertelt-Prigione and Regitz-Zagrosek
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1740-1741.
FULL TEXT
|