You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 21, November 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Diagnosis
 •Angiology
 •Computed Tomography
 •PET/ SPECT Imaging
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism

William B. Hall, MD; Sherstin G. Truitt, MD; Leslie P. Scheunemann, MD; Sidharth A. Shah, MD; M. Patricia Rivera, MD; Leonard A. Parker, MD; Shannon S. Carson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(21):1961-1965.

Background  Chest computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) are frequently ordered for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department, but non-PE findings are often noted. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and management implications of incidental findings on chest CTAs ordered to assess for PE.

Methods  In a cross-sectional study, we reviewed 589 pulmonary CTAs that were ordered in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. We measured the prevalence of PE and placed other findings into the following 3 categories: (1) findings that provided potential alternative explanations for acute symptoms, (2) incidental findings that required clinical or radiologic follow-up, and (3) other findings that required less urgent or no follow-up. We reviewed all newly diagnosed pulmonary nodules and significant thoracic adenopathy and determined standard recommended clinical follow-up.

Results  Pulmonary embolism was found in 55 of 589 CTAs (9%). A total of 195 CTAs (33%) had findings that supported alternative diagnoses. A total of 141 patients (24%) had a new incidental finding that required diagnostic follow-up, including 73 patients (13%) with a new pulmonary nodule and 51 patients (9%) with new adenopathy. Using current clinical guidelines, follow-up computed tomography or another procedure would be recommended for 96% of patients with new incidental pulmonary nodules.

Conclusions  The CTAs that are ordered in the emergency department are more than twice as likely to find an incidental pulmonary nodule or adenopathy than a PE. Systematic approaches should be developed to help primary care physicians contend with a growing number of clinically relevant incidental radiologic findings.


Author Affiliations: Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs Hall, Truitt, Rivera, and Carson) and Geriatrics (Dr Scheunemann), Department of Medicine, and Department of Radiology (Dr Parker), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina (Dr Shah).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography to Diagnose Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Comment on "The Prevalence of Clinically Relevant Incidental Findings on Chest Computed Tomographic Angiograms Ordered to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism"
Ami Schattner
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(21):1966-1968.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Increased Emergency Department Computed Tomography Use for Common Chest Symptoms Without Clear Patient Benefits
Coco and O'Gurek
J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:33-41.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Method to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism: David against Goliath(s)
Konstantinides
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;184:626-627.
FULL TEXT  

The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research
Hlatky and Heidenreich
J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1859-1866.
FULL TEXT  

Time Trends in Pulmonary Embolism in the United States: Evidence of Overdiagnosis
Wiener et al.
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:831-837.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Steinfort et al.
Eur Respir J 2011;37:902-910.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiovascular Disease: Prediction with Ancillary Aortic Findings on Chest CT Scans in Routine Practice
Gondrie et al.
Radiology 2010;257:549-559.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary CT Angiography in Patients Suspected of Having Pulmonary Embolism: Case Finding or Screening Procedure?
Pistolesi
Radiology 2010;256:334-337.
FULL TEXT  

Incidental Findings on CT Angiography for Evaluation of PE
JWatch Emergency Med. 2010;2010:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.