You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 22, Dec 14/28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Review Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Renal Diseases
 •Renal Diseases, Other
 •Review
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Computed Tomography
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Annual Progression of Coronary Calcification in Trials of Preventive Therapies

A Systematic Review

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH; Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2064-2070.

Background  Coronary artery calcification (CAC) measured by computed tomography is radiographic confirmation of atherosclerosis, predicts cardiovascular events, and has been evaluated as a surrogate measure in randomized trials.

Methods  We performed a literature search for prospective randomized trials in which CAC was measured at baseline and at 1 year or more of follow-up. We computed the weighted mean annualized rate of CAC progression for a variety of therapies tested in these trials.

Results  Ten trials (n = 2612) met our criteria and were included. Electron-beam, double-helix, and multislice computed tomography were used in 6, 2, and 2 trials, respectively. Agatston (8 trials) and volumetric (2 trials) methods were used for CAC evaluation. In 5 trials in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) (n = 2135; age, ~64 years; ~39% women; follow-up, ~26 months), therapies included statins (n = 1370), placebo (n = 564), and antihypertensives (n = 201). In 5 trials in subjects with chronic kidney disease (n = 477; age, ~55 years; ~34% women; follow-up, ~14 months), interventions included low-phosphorus diet (n = 29), sevelamer hydrochloride (n = 229), and calcium-based phosphate binders (n = 219). The mean (SD) weighted annualized CAC increase overall and in patients with CVD and chronic kidney disease was 17.2% (6.7%), 16.9% (5.2%), and 18.4 (11.1%), respectively (P < .001). The rate among those assigned blinded placebo was 14.6% (1.0%) (2 trials). There was no consistent or reproducible treatment effect of any therapy on this outcome measured at 1 year.

Conclusion  The 1-year change in CAC does not appear to be a suitable surrogate end point for treatment trials in patients with CVD or chronic kidney disease.


Author Affiliations: Divisions of Cardiology (Drs McCullough and Chinnaiyan) and Nutrition and Preventive Medicine (Dr McCullough), William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification: Not Down-and-Out
John W. McEvoy and Michael J. Blaha
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(8):735-736.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification: Not Down-and-Out—Reply
Peter A. McCullough and Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(8):736.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

A Double Take on Serial Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcification
Patrick G. O’Malley
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2051-2052.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerosis
Joshi et al.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;0:jer319v1-jer319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lipoprotein Subfractions and Particle Size in End-Stage Renal Disease
McCullough et al.
CJASN 2011;6:2738-2739.
FULL TEXT  

Progression of coronary artery calcification in renal transplant recipients
Seyahi et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;0:gfr558v1-gfr558.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology
Perrone-Filardi et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;32:1986-1993.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Statin therapy in lupus-mediated atherogenesis: two birds with one stone?
van Leuven et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:245-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pioglitazone Versus Glimepiride on Coronary Artery Calcium Progression in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Secondary End Point of the CHICAGO Study
Davidson et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2010;30:1873-1876.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of cinacalcet on vascular calcification in haemodialysis patients
Almirall et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:2800-2800.
FULL TEXT  

Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification: Not Down-and-Out
McEvoy and Blaha
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:735-736.
FULL TEXT  

Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification: Not Down-and-Out--Reply
McCullough and Chinnaiyan
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:736-736.
FULL TEXT  

A Double Take on Serial Measurement of Coronary Artery Calcification
O'Malley
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2051-2052.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.