You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 3, February 9, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Overrides of Medication Alerts in Ambulatory Care

Thomas Isaac, MD, MBA, MPH; Joel S. Weissman, PhD; Roger B. Davis, ScD; Michael Massagli, PhD; Adrienne Cyrulik, MPH; Daniel Z. Sands, MD, MPH; Saul N. Weingart, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(3):305-311.

Background  Electronic prescribing systems with decision support may improve patient safety in ambulatory care by offering drug allergy and drug interaction alerts. However, preliminary studies show that clinicians override most of these alerts.

Methods  We performed a retrospective analysis of 233 537 medication safety alerts generated by 2872 clinicians in Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania who used a common electronic prescribing system from January 1, 2006, through September 30, 2006. We used multivariate techniques to examine factors associated with alert acceptance.

Results  A total of 6.6% of electronic prescription attempts generated alerts. Clinicians accepted 9.2% of drug interaction alerts and 23.0% of allergy alerts. High-severity interactions accounted for most alerts (61.6%); clinicians accepted high-severity alerts slightly more often than moderate- or low-severity interaction alerts (10.4%, 7.3%, and 7.1%, respectively; P < .001). Clinicians accepted 2.2% to 43.1% of high-severity interaction alerts, depending on the classes of interacting medications. In multivariable analyses, we found no difference in alert acceptance among clinicians of different specialties (P = .16). Clinicians were less likely to accept a drug interaction alert if the patient had previously received the alerted medication (odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.03).

Conclusion  Clinicians override most medication alerts, suggesting that current medication safety alerts may be inadequate to protect patient safety.


Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Drs Isaac, Davis, Sands, and Weingart), Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Weissman), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (Ms Cyrulik), Center for Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Drs Isaac and Weingart), and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School (Drs Isaac, Weissman, Davis, Sands, and Weingart), Boston; PatientsLikeMe Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Massagli); and Cisco Systems, San Jose, California (Dr Sands).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Overrides of Medication Alerts in Ambulatory Care
Stephen N. Rosenberg, Maureen Sullivan, Iver A. Juster, and Jeffrey Jacques
Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(14):1337.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The effectiveness of a new generation of computerized drug alerts in reducing the risk of injury from drug side effects: a cluster randomized trial
Tamblyn et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;0:amiajnl-2011-000609v1-amiajnl-2011-000609.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of a basic and an advanced pharmacotherapy-related clinical decision support system in a hospital care setting in the Netherlands
Eppenga et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:66-71.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and validation of a survey instrument for assessing prescribers' perception of computerized drug-drug interaction alerts
Zheng et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i51-i61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians
Richardson and Ash
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i28-i35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Point-of-Care Electronic Prompts: An Effective Means of Increasing Compliance, Demonstrating Quality, and Improving Outcome
Schwann et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2011;113:869-876.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances
Thomas et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;0:amiajnl-2011-000209v1-amiajnl-2011-000209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A framework for evaluating the appropriateness of clinical decision support alerts and responses
McCoy et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;0:amiajnl-2011-000185v1-amiajnl-2011-000185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support
Seidling et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:479-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical issues associated with drug-drug interactions: Highlights of a multistakeholder conference
Hines et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68:941-946.
FULL TEXT  

Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error?
Coleman et al.
JRSM 2011;104:208-218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems
Wright et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:232-242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Customizing clinical decision support to prevent excessive drug-drug interaction alerts
Horn et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2011;68:662-664.
FULL TEXT  

Ability of pharmacy clinical decision-support software to alert users about clinically important drug-drug interactions
Saverno et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:32-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized clinical trial of a customized electronic alert requiring an affirmative response compared to a control group receiving a commercial passive CPOE alert: NSAID-warfarin co-prescribing as a test case
Strom et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:411-415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Future of clinical decision support in computerized prescriber order entry
Chaffee
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010;67:932-935.
FULL TEXT  

Alert fatigue
Cash
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009;66:2098-2101.
FULL TEXT  

Clinicians' Assessments of Electronic Medication Safety Alerts in Ambulatory Care
Weingart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1627-1632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Empirical Model to Estimate the Potential Impact of Medication Safety Alerts on Patient Safety, Health Care Utilization, and Cost in Ambulatory Care
Weingart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1465-1473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Overrides of Medication Alerts in Ambulatory Care
Rosenberg et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1337-1337.
FULL TEXT  

Consider the Content of Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts
Sweidan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1338-1338.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.