You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 169 No. 6, March 23, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Nutrition/ Malnutrition
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Surgery
 •Orthopedic Surgery
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prevention of Nonvertebral Fractures With Oral Vitamin D and Dose Dependency

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari, DrPH; Walter C. Willett, DrPH; John B. Wong, MD; Andreas E. Stuck, MD; Hannes B. Staehelin, MD; E. John Orav, PhD; Anna Thoma, MD; Douglas P. Kiel, MD; Jana Henschkowski, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(6):551-561.

Background  Antifracture efficacy with supplemental vitamin D has been questioned by recent trials.

Methods  We performed a meta-analysis on the efficacy of oral supplemental vitamin D in preventing nonvertebral and hip fractures among older individuals (≥65 years). We included 12 double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for nonvertebral fractures (n = 42 279) and 8 RCTs for hip fractures (n = 40 886) comparing oral vitamin D, with or without calcium, with calcium or placebo. To incorporate adherence to treatment, we multiplied the dose by the percentage of adherence to estimate the mean received dose (dose x adherence) for each trial.

Results  The pooled relative risk (RR) was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.96) for prevention of nonvertebral fractures and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-1.05) for the prevention of hip fractures, but with significant heterogeneity for both end points. Including all trials, antifracture efficacy increased significantly with a higher dose and higher achieved blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for both end points. Consistently, pooling trials with a higher received dose of more than 400 IU/d resolved heterogeneity. For the higher dose, the pooled RR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89; n = 33 265 subjects from 9 trials) for nonvertebral fractures and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69-0.97; n = 31 872 subjects from 5 trials) for hip fractures. The higher dose reduced nonvertebral fractures in community-dwelling individuals (–29%) and institutionalized older individuals (–15%), and its effect was independent of additional calcium supplementation.

Conclusion  Nonvertebral fracture prevention with vitamin D is dose dependent, and a higher dose should reduce fractures by at least 20% for individuals aged 65 years or older.


Author Affiliations: Center on Aging and Mobility (Drs Bischoff-Ferrari and Henschkowski) and Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine (Drs Bischoff-Ferrari and Thoma), University of Zurich, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Departments of Nutrition (Drs Bischoff-Ferrari and Willett) and Biostatistics (Dr Orav), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston (Dr Wong); Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Zieglerspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (Drs Stuck and Henschkowski); Department of Geriatrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (Dr Staehelin); and Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Kiel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Update: A 55-Year-Old Woman With Osteopenia
Mattson-DiCecca et al.
JAMA 2009;302:2023-2024.
FULL TEXT  

Vitamin D: An Evidence-Based Review
Kulie et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:698-706.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis Disease Management: What Every Orthopaedic Surgeon Should Know
Dell et al.
JBJS 2009;91:79-86.
FULL TEXT  

Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Bischoff-Ferrari et al.
BMJ 2009;339:b3692-b3692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Bone, Fracture, and Exercise: The Key Role of Vitamin D
Annweiler and Beauchet
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1638-1638.
FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Bone, Fracture, and Exercise: The Key Role of Vitamin D--Reply
Bischoff-Ferrari et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1638-1638.
FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology of Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cancer Mortality
PILZ et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:3699-3704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.