You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 12, June 28, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy

A Critical Reappraisal

Michel de Lorgeril, MD; Patricia Salen, BSc; John Abramson, MD; Sylvie Dodin, MD; Tomohito Hamazaki, PhD; Willy Kostucki, MD; Harumi Okuyama, PhD; Bruno Pavy, MD; Mikael Rabaeus, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1032-1036.

Background  Among the recently reported cholesterol-lowering drug trials, the JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention) trial is unique: it reports a substantial decrease in the risk of cardiovascular diseases among patients without coronary heart disease and with normal or low cholesterol levels.

Methods  Careful review of both results and methods used in the trial and comparison with expected data.

Results  The trial was flawed. It was discontinued (according to prespecified rules) after fewer than 2 years of follow-up, with no differences between the 2 groups on the most objective criteria. Clinical data showed a major discrepancy between significant reduction of nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction but no effect on mortality from stroke and myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular mortality was surprisingly low compared with total mortality—between 5% and 18%—whereas the expected rate would have been close to 40%. Finally, there was a very low case-fatality rate of myocardial infarction, far from the expected number of close to 50%. The possibility that bias entered the trial is particularly concerning because of the strong commercial interest in the study.

Conclusion  The results of the trial do not support the use of statin treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and raise troubling questions concerning the role of commercial sponsors.


Author Affiliations: Laboratoire Cœur and Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Université Joseph Fourier and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Grenoble, France (Dr de Lorgeril and Ms Salen); Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Abramson); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (Dr Dodin); Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Natural Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan (Dr Hamazaki); Cardiology Department, Clinique Antoine Depage, Brussels, Belgium (Dr Kostucki); Open Research Center for Lipid Nutrition, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan (Dr Okuyama); Réadaptation Cardiovasculaire, Centre Hospitalier de Machecoul, Machecoul, France (Dr Pavy); and Cardiology Department, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland (Dr Rabaeus).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Primary Prevention Cardiovascular Disease: Better Than Drugs
John J. Pippin
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(20):1860-1861.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy for Primary Prevention: Still Much We Don't Know
Lee A. Green
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1007-1008.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Statins and All-Cause Mortality in High-Risk Primary Prevention: A Meta-analysis of 11 Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 65 229 Participants
Kausik K. Ray, Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai, Sebhat Erqou, Peter Sever, J. Wouter Jukema, Ian Ford, and Naveed Sattar
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1024-1031.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

By Jove! What Is a Clinician to Make of JUPITER?
Sanjay Kaul, Ryan P. Morrissey, and George A. Diamond
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(12):1073-1077.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-Analysis of Statin Effects in Women Versus Men
Kostis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:572-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversy and Consensus About Statin Use: It Is Not About the Sex
Mosca
J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:583-584.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of the use of low- and high-potency statins in people at low cardiovascular risk
Conly et al.
CMAJ 2011;183:E1180-E1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex/Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: What a Difference a Decade Makes
Mosca et al.
Circulation 2011;124:2145-2154.
FULL TEXT  

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Reduces Postprandial Lipidemia in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial
Phillips et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011;184:355-361.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Misinformation in the medical literature: What role do error and fraud play?
Steen
J. Med. Ethics 2011;37:498-503.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical use of the Framingham risk score in primary prevention: Canadian perspective
Bosomworth
cfp 2011;57:417-423.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary prevention of stroke: blood pressure, lipids, and heart failure
Endres et al.
Eur Heart J 2011;32:545-552.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cost-Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin Therapy: JUPITER (Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)
Hlatky
J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:792-793.
FULL TEXT  

Trials by Independent Expert Bodies
Breimer and Mikhailidis
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:2042-2042.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Prevention Cardiovascular Disease: Better Than Drugs
Pippin
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1860-1861.
FULL TEXT  

JUPITER seems to be bypassed
Murray
BMJ 2010;341:c5835-c5835.
FULL TEXT  

Statins and Primary Prevention for Patients at High Risk for Heart Disease
JWatch General 2010;2010:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy for Primary Prevention: Still Much We Don't Know
Green
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1007-1008.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.