 |
 |

HEALTH CARE REFORM
Nonsurgical Weight Loss for Extreme Obesity in Primary Care SettingsResults of the Louisiana Obese Subjects Study
Donna H. Ryan, MD;
William D. Johnson, PhD;
Valerie H. Myers, PhD;
Tiffany L. Prather, RN;
Meghan M. McGlone, MPH;
Jennifer Rood, PhD;
Phillip J. Brantley, PhD;
George A. Bray, MD;
Alok K. Gupta, MD;
Alan P. Broussard, MD;
Bryan G. Barootes, MD;
Brian L. Elkins, MD;
David E. Gaudin, MD;
Robert L. Savory, MD;
Ricky D. Brock, RN;
Geralyn Datz, PhD;
Srininvasa R. Pothakamuri, MS;
G. Tipton McKnight, MD;
Kaj Stenlof, MD, PhD;
Lars V. Sjöström, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):146-154.
Background Effective primary care practice (PCP) treatments are needed for extreme obesity. The Louisiana Obese Subjects Study (LOSS) tested whether, with brief training, PCPs could effectively implement weight loss for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 40 to 60.
Methods The LOSS, a 2-year (July 5, 2005, through January 30, 2008) randomized, controlled, "pragmatic clinical trial" trained 7 PCPs and 1 research clinic in obesity management. Primary outcome measure was year-2 percentage change from baseline weight. Volunteers (597) were screened and randomized to intensive medical intervention (IMI) (n = 200) or usual care condition (UCC) (n = 190). The UCC group had instruction in an Internet weight management program. The IMI group recommendations included a 900-kcal liquid diet for 12 weeks or less, group behavioral counseling, structured diet, and choice of pharmacotherapy (sibutramine hydrochloride, orlistat, or diethylpropion hydrochloride) during months 3 to 7 and continued use of medications and maintenance strategies for months 8 to 24.
Results The mean age of participants was 47 years; 83% were women, and 75% were white. Retention rates were 51% for the IMI group and 46% for the UCC group (P = .30). After 2 years, the results were as follows: (1) among 390 randomized participants, 31% in the IMI group achieved a 5% or more weight loss and 7% achieved a 20% weight loss or more, compared with 9% and 1% of those in the UCC group. (2) The mean ± SEM baseline observation carried forward analysis showed a weight loss of –4.9% ± 0.8% in IMI and –0.2 ± 0.3% in UCC. (3) Last observation carried forward analysis showed a weight loss of –8.3% ± 0.79% for IMI, whereas UCC was –0.0% ± 0.4%. (4) A total of 101 IMI completers lost –9.7% ± 1.3% (–12.7 ± 1.7 kg), whereas 89 UCC completers lost –0.4% ± 0.7% (–0.5 ± 0.9 kg); (P < .001 for all group differences). Many metabolic parameters improved.
Conclusion Primary care practices can initiate effective medical management for extreme obesity; future efforts must target improving retention and weight loss maintenance.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00115063
Author Affiliations: Pennington Biomedical Research Center of the Louisiana State University (LSU) System, Baton Rouge (Drs Ryan, Johnson, Myers, Rood, Brantley, Bray, and Gupta and Ms McGlone); Pennington Management of Clinical Trials, Baton Rouge (Ms Prather and Mssrs Brock and Pothakamuri); LSU Health Science Center, New Orleans (Drs Broussard and Barootes); LSU Unit, Lafayette (Dr Broussard); LSU Unit, Lake Charles (Dr Barootes); LSU Health Science Center, Shreveport (Dr Elkins); LSU Unit, Alexandria (Dr Elkins); Willis Knighton–Pierremont Health Center, Shreveport (Dr Savory); and Medical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden (Drs Stenlof and Sjöström). Dr Gaudin is in private practice in Hammond, Louisiana. Dr Datz is in private practice in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. Dr McKnight is in private practice in Baton Rouge. Ms Prather is now with the Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Mr Brock is now with Aureus Research Consultants LLC. Mr Pothakamuri is now with Cisco Systems Inc.
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):120.
FULL TEXT
Tackling Obesity: Is Primary Care Up to the Challenge?
Robert F. Kushner
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):121-123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of the DASH Diet Alone and in Combination With Exercise and Weight Loss on Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Men and Women With High Blood Pressure: The ENCORE Study
James A. Blumenthal, Michael A. Babyak, Alan Hinderliter, Lana L. Watkins, Linda Craighead, Pao-Hwa Lin, Carla Caccia, Julie Johnson, Robert Waugh, and Andrew Sherwood
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):126-135.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Randomized Trial of a Low-Carbohydrate Diet vs Orlistat Plus a Low-Fat Diet for Weight Loss
William S. Yancy, Jr, Eric C. Westman, Jennifer R. McDuffie, Steven C. Grambow, Amy S. Jeffreys, Jamiyla Bolton, Allison Chalecki, and Eugene Z. Oddone
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):136-145.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions for Individuals With Severe Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the Look AHEAD trial
Unick et al.
Diabetes Care 2011;34:2152-2157.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: What Can Be Unified and What Needs to Be Individualized?
Eckel et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:1654-1663.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: What Can Be Unified and What Needs to Be Individualized?
Eckel et al.
Diabetes Care 2011;34:1424-1430.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diet and Physical Activity Interventions in Severely Obese Adults
Hemmingsson et al.
JAMA 2011;305:563-564.
FULL TEXT
Obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors after weight loss: a clinical trial comparing gastric bypass surgery and intensive lifestyle intervention
Hofso et al.
Eur J Endocrinol 2010;163:735-745.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Diet and Physical Activity Interventions on Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Severely Obese Adults: A Randomized Trial
Goodpaster et al.
JAMA 2010;304:1795-1802.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tackling Obesity: Is Primary Care Up to the Challenge?
Kushner
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:121-123.
FULL TEXT
|