• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Informatics/ Internet in Medicine  • Informatics, Other  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Health Care Reform  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Participation by Minnesota Primary Care Practices

Patricia Fontaine, MD, MS; Therese Zink, MD, MPH; Raymond G. Boyle, PhD, MPH; John Kralewski, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(7):622-629.

Background  The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 will provide $36 billion to promote electronic health records and the formation of regional centers that foster community-wide electronic health information exchange (HIE) with the ultimate goal of a nationwide health information network. Minnesota's e-Health Law, passed in 2007, mandates electronic health record and HIE participation by all clinics and hospitals. To achieve these goals, small primary care practices must participate. Factors that motivate or prevent them from doing so are examined.

Methods  From November 10, 2008, through February 20, 2009, we gathered data (through questionnaires and interviews) from 9 primary care practices in Minnesota with fewer than 20 physicians and with varying degrees of electronic health records and HIE involvement.

Results  No practice was fully involved in a regional HIE, and HIE was not part of most practices' short-term strategic plans. External motivators for HIE included state and federal mandates, payer incentives, and increasing expectations for quality reporting. Internal motivators were anticipated cost savings, quality, patient safety, and efficiency. The most frequently cited barriers were lack of interoperability, cost, lack of buy-in for a shared HIE vision, security and privacy, and limited technical infrastructure and support.

Conclusions  Currently, small practices do not have the means or motivation to fully participate in regional HIEs, but many are exchanging health data in piecemeal arrangements with stakeholders with whom they are not directly competing for patients. To achieve more comprehensive HIE, regional health information organizations must provide leadership and financial incentives for community-wide meaningful use of interoperable electronic health records.

Author Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Litmus Test for Health Information Exchange Success: Will Small Practices Participate?: Comment on "Health Information Exchange"
Robert S. Rudin
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(7):629-630.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Behavioral health providers' beliefs about health information exchange: a statewide survey
Shank
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;0:amiajnl-2011-000374v1-amiajnl-2011-000374.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cloudy Confidentiality: Clinical and Legal Implications of Cloud Computing in Health Care
Klein
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2011;39:571-578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use
Unertl et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;0:amiajnl-2011-000432v1-amiajnl-2011-000432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Survey of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States: Implications for Meaningful Use
Adler-Milstein et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2011;154:666-671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange
Hincapie et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:60-65.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT