You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 170 No. 7, April 12, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigation
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Telemedicine
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Association of Health Information Technology and Teleintensivist Coverage With Decreased Mortality and Ventilator Use in Critically Ill Patients

Matthew McCambridge, MD; Kari Jones, PhD; Hannah Paxton, RN, MPH; Kathy Baker, RN, MPH; Elliot J. Sussman, MD; Jeff Etchason, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(7):648-653.

Background  Little evidence exists to support implementing various health information technologies, such as telemedicine, in intensive care units.

Methods  A coordinated health information technology bundle (HITB) was implemented along with remote intensivist coverage (RIC) at a 727-bed academic community hospital. Critical care specialists provided bedside coverage during the day and RIC at night to achieve intensivist coverage 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. We evaluated the effect of HITB-RIC on mortality, ventilator and vasopressor use, and the intervention length of stay. We compared our results with those achieved at baseline.

Results  A total of 954 control patients who received care for 16 months before the implementation of HITB-RIC and 959 study patients who received care for 10 months after the implementation were included in the analysis. Mortality for the control and intervention groups were 21.4% and 14.7%, respectively. In addition, the observed mortality for the intervention group was 75.8% (P < .001) of that predicted by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality equations, which was 29.5% lower relative to the control group. Regression results confirm that the hospital mortality of the intensive care unit patients was significantly lower after implementation of the intervention, controlling for predicted risk of mortality and do-not-resuscitate status. Overall, intervention patients also had significantly less (P = .001) use of mechanical ventilation, controlling for body-system diagnosis category and severity of illness.

Conclusion  The use of HITB-RIC was associated with significantly lower mortality and less ventilator use in critically ill patients.


Author Affiliations: Divisions of Critical Care Medicine (Dr McCambridge) and General Internal Medicine (Drs Sussman and Etchason), Department of Community Health, Health Studies, and Education (Drs Jones and Etchason and Mss Paxton and Baker), Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey (Dr McCambridge); and Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Dr Sussman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Specific Elements of Teleintensivist Paradigm Require Additional Scrutiny and Justification
Theresa M. Davis and William L. Jackson, Jr
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(16):1509-1510.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Specific Elements of Teleintensivist Paradigm Require Additional Scrutiny and Justification—Reply
Matthew McCambridge, Kari Jones, Hannah Paxton, Kathy Baker, Elliot Sussman, and Jeff Etchason
Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(16):1510.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Point: Should Tele-ICU Services Be Eligible for Professional Fee Billing? Yes. Tele-ICUs and the Triple Aim
McCambridge et al.
Chest 2011;140:847-849.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes in Critical Access Rural Hospitals
Joynt et al.
JAMA 2011;306:45-52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Research Agenda in ICU Telemedicine: A Statement From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative
Kahn et al.
Chest 2011;140:230-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, and Preventable Complications Among Critically Ill Patients Before and After Tele-ICU Reengineering of Critical Care Processes
Lilly et al.
JAMA 2011;305:2175-2183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Telemedicine Intensive Care Unit Coverage on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Young et al.
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:498-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nursing Perspectives on 24/7 Intensivist Coverage
Lindell et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010;182:1338-1340.
FULL TEXT  

Specific Elements of Teleintensivist Paradigm Require Additional Scrutiny and Justification--Reply
McCambridge et al.
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1510-1510.
FULL TEXT  

Specific Elements of Teleintensivist Paradigm Require Additional Scrutiny and Justification
Davis and Jackson
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1509-1510.
FULL TEXT  

Health Information Technology and Teleintensivist Program's Effect on Critically Ill Patients
JWatch General 2010;2010:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.