• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Readers Reply  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Practice, Other  • Patient-Physician Communication  • Pediatrics, Other  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Less Is More  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Meeting the Responsibility of Professionalism

The Good Stewardship Working Group

Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1385-1390. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.231

Background  Physicians can adhere to the principles of professionalism by practicing high-quality, evidence-based care and advocating for just and cost-effective distribution of finite clinical resources. To promote these principles, the National Physicians Alliance (NPA) initiated a project titled "Promoting Good Stewardship in Clinical Practice" that aimed to develop a list of the top 5 activities in family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics where the quality of care could be improved.

Methods  Working groups of NPA members in each of the 3 primary care specialties agreed that an ideal activity would be one that was common in primary care practice, that was strongly supported by the evidence, and that would lead to significant health benefits and reduce risks, harms, and costs. A modification of nominal group process was used to generate a preliminary list of activities. A first round of field testing was conducted with 83 primary care physicians, and a second round of field testing with an additional 172 physicians.

Results  The first round of field testing resulted in 1 activity being deleted from the family medicine list. Support for the remaining activities was strong. The second round of field testing showed strong support for all activities. The family medicine and internal medicine groups independently selected 3 activities that were the same, so the final lists reflect 12 unique activities that could improve clinical care.

Conclusions  Physician panels in the primary care specialties of family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics identified common clinical activities that could lead to higher quality care and better use of finite clinical resources. Field testing showed support among physicians for the evidence supporting the activities, the potential positive impact on medical care quality and cost, and the ease with which the activities could be performed. We recommend that these "Top 5" lists of activities be implemented in primary care practice across the United States.

Author Affiliations: All members of The Good Stewardship Working Group were authors.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The "Top 5" Health Care Activities for Which Less Is More: Comment on "The ‘Top 5’ Lists in Primary Care"
Deborah Grady
Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1390.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What Is Professionalism?
Finestone
Arch Intern Med 2012;172:197-197.
FULL TEXT  

High-Value Testing Begins With a Few Simple Questions
Laine
ANN INTERN MED 2012;156:162-163.
FULL TEXT  

"Top 5" Lists Top $5 Billion
Kale et al.
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1856-1858.
FULL TEXT  

RAPID RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE

re map of medicine.
Nasir Hannan
Arch Intern Med Online, 25 May 2011.
TEXT